Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 IN THE MATTER OF JACOB MICHELETTI -- rank: 1000

... L. 1999, c. 441 §2, was enacted and codified as N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29e, with the stated purpose of requiring that the SHBC provide ... meets the medical necessity standard as established by the carrier. . . [ N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29e.] The two statutes used the same language respecting coverage of ... coverage, it would have explicitly done so. In interpreting whether N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29e mandates the treatment sought for autism, we must consider that ... the DOBI, and find that it is equally applicable to N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29e. The SHBC's restrictive literal reading conflicts with the legislative ... from coverage despite the legislative directive to the contrary in N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29e. If the SHBC is correct in its reading, the statute ... 8 (App. Div. 2001). The spirit and stated intention of N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29e cannot be read to exclude the medically necessary treatment ...

docket:	a4418-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-01-17
status:	published
citation:	389 N.J. Super. 510
Document Size:	32535

2 WALTER MARKIEWICZ v. STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION -- rank: 758

... of the court was delivered by PAYNE, J.A.D.      N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29e, applicable to health insurance coverage offered by the respondent State ...

docket:	A0507-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-01-17
status:	published
citation:	390 N.J. Super. 289 915 A.2d 553
Document Size:	35471

3 J.S - v. STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION -- rank: 677

... same terms and conditions as provided for any other sickness." N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29e. Appellant also claimed the Commission erred by denying coverage based ... conditions as provided for any other sickness under the contract." N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29e. The MHPA also provides that a person with a BBMI ...

docket:	a1214-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-03-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47316

4 MAUREEN SALAMON v. STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION -- rank: 645

... parity in coverage for biologically-based mental illnesses, including autism. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29e. Those cases also presented us with a clear conflict between ... Parity Law, N.J.S.A. 17:48-6v. Construing N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29e, the analogous law applicable to coverage by the State Plan ...

docket:	A3181-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-02-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31679

5 IN THE MATTER OF H.S -- rank: 474

... terms and conditions as any other sickness under the contract, N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29e. She further argues the Commission cannot deny coverage based on ...

docket:	a4095-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-07-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15898