Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Borough of East Rutherford v. East Rutherford -- rank: 1000

... 17.29(C), the trial court’s reasoning focused on N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.36 (addressing employer participation in SHBP) and N.J.S.A ... L. 2010, c. 2, § 8 (adding section b. to N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.36 and expressly making state-negotiated changes to SHBP plan conditions ... 17.29(C)].” 9 In 2010, the Legislature added N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.36(b), providing in part that “[a]ll changes in ...

docket:	A-24-11
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2012-03-19
status:
citation:	213 N.J. 190 61 A.3d 941
Document Size:	110389

2 ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICERS PBA LOCAL 183 and ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR OFFICERS FOR LODGE 106 v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DIVISION OF PENSIONS AND BENEFITS -- rank: 804

... as to participating employers . . . the same as for the State.' N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.36 (a); see also N.J. Sch. 7 An employer is ...

docket:	a1228-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-06-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	48985

3 PATERSON POLICE PBA LOCAL NO. 1 v. CITY OF PATERSON -- rank: 777

... retired employees from participation in the SHBP. He explained that ' N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.36 requires uniformity between the health benefits offered through the SHBP ... 421 N.J. Super. 75, 100 (Law Div. 2011) (holding N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.36(b) is intended 'to increase uniformity in health benefits and ...

docket:	a3937-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-04-19
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	68496

4 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 97 v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 723

... S. 3 (March 1, 2010). Chapter 2, Section 8 (amending N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.36(b)) (the Section 8 Applicability Provision), made those changes in ...

docket:	a4086-10xx
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-27
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	101434

5 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 97 v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 723

... S. 3 (March 1, 2010). Chapter 2, Section 8 (amending N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.36(b)) (the Section 8 Applicability Provision), made those changes in ...

docket:	a3916-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-31
status:	published
citation:	434 N.J.Super. 393 84 A.3d 989
Document Size:	101618

6 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 97 v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 723

... S. 3 (March 1, 2010). Chapter 2, Section 8 (amending N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.36(b)) (the Section 8 Applicability Provision), made those changes in ...

docket:	a3274-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-31
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	101452

7 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 97 v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 723

... S. 3 (March 1, 2010). Chapter 2, Section 8 (amending N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.36(b)) (the Section 8 Applicability Provision), made those changes in ...

docket:	a3868-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-31
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	101451

8 BOROUGH OF EAST RUTHERFORD v. EAST RUTHERFORD PBA LOCAL 275 -- rank: 680

... participant, states in pertinent part — and I'm referencing N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.36 regarding participation in [the] Health and Benefits Program. And it ... rendered a reasonably debatable interpretation of the contract. See also N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.36 (requiring that the rules and regulations of the SHBC be ... State employees and members of the PBA as required by N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.36 and N.J.A.C. 17:9-1.4. Thus ...

docket:	a5310-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30648

9 FACULTY ASSOCIATION OF OCEAN COUNTY COLLEGE v. STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION et al. -- rank: 612

... State, employees of the State and dependents of such employees." N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.36. This section expresses a legislative intent that there be uniformity ... would be contrary to the uniformity standard set forth in N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.36. Moreover, the SHBC presented uncontradicted evidence that this requirement had ... of benefits between State and local employees set forth in N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.36 and was not arbitrary or capricious. Affirmed. (continued) (continued) 8 ...

docket:	A1866-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-01-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35028