Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.38a")   1 to 1 of 1 results. Run time: 0.815 seconds | Search time: 0.809 seconds    
1 FORT LEE PBA LOCAL NO 245 v. BOROUGH OF FORT LEE -- rank: 1000
... Contillo in the Chancery Division. Briefly stated, the relevant statute, N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.38a, makes no reference to an arbitration award. The effective date ... the language of P.L. 2010, c. 2, § 5 ( N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.38a) is clear and unambiguous in only extending its effective date ... Chancery Division correctly held that the borough was required by N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.38a to deduct 1.5% of employees' base salary for health ... 3 P.L. 2010, c. 2, § 5, codified at N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.38a as relevant to this case, states: Commencing on the effective ...
docket: a1646-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-01-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20606

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!