Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 CITY OF CAMDEN v. JANE KENNY, et al. -- rank: 1000

... Services for the purposes of those statutes as well as N.J.S.A. 52:27BB-15. As you are aware, the Local Finance Board adopted a ... Camden effective October 2, 2000. Consistent with the provisions of N.J.S.A. 52:27BB-15, the City of Camden may seek review of this order ...

docket:	A0544-00
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2000-12-22
status:	published
citation:	336 N.J. Super. 53
Document Size:	40349

2 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1013-15.opn.html -- rank: 883

... may apply to the board for a review and redetermination.' N.J.S.A. 52:27BB-15. Feld cannot show he was 'aggrieved' by the Director's ... was an entirely permissible interpretation of the standing requirements of N.J.S.A. 52:27BB-15. All arguments made by Feld on appeal not expressly addressed ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	11675

3 IN THE MATTER OF APPEAL HEARING REQUEST, OCEAN TOWNSHIP -- rank: 867

... investigation of citizen's complaints of misfeasance. Loigman relies on N.J.S.A. 52:27BB-15 to support his proposition that the LFB must hear his ... decision made by the Director by appeal to the LFB. N.J.S.A. 52:27BB-15. Judicial review of the Board's decision is available by ... should have been filed within ten days as allowed by N.J.S.A. 52:27BB-15. Rumana v. County of Passaic , 397 N.J. Super. 157 ...

docket:	a2005-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-11-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31173

4 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4683-18.opn.html -- rank: 805

... of the administrative remedies provided them by the Legislature under N.J.S.A. 52:27BB-15, we dismiss the matter as moot. Although the dispute has ... the Local Finance Board, in accordance with the requirements of N.J.S.A. 52:27BB-15.' Plaintiffs did not appeal the Director's decision to establish ... tax levy to the Local Finance Board in accordance with N.J.S.A. 52:27BB-15. Instead, on April 29 they filed a pro se complaint ... properly made to the Local Finance Board in accordance with N.J.S.A. 52:27BB-15. Appeal dismissed. A-4683-18 10 This archive is a ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	16696

5 NORTHWEST BERGEN COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY v. KATHLEEN A. DONOVAN -- rank: 649

... N.J. Const. art. V, § 4, ¶ 1(e). N.J.S.A. 52:27BB-15 provides that determinations of the Director of Local Government Services ...

docket:	a0285-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-09-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33045

6 SCOTT RUMANA, et al. v. COUNTY OF PASSAIC, et al. -- rank: 606

... failed to exhaust the administrative remedies available to them under N.J.S.A. 52:27BB-15 as they did not timely seek review by the LFB ... final agency decision. Furthermore, an administrative remedy was available because N.J.S.A. 52:27BB-15 provides: A person, including a taxpayer or citizen, aggrieved by ...

docket:	A1135-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-12-03
status:	unpublished
citation:	397 N.J.Super. 157 936 A.2d 971
Document Size:	123047