Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 52:34-12")   1 to 15 of 23 results. Run time: 0.812 seconds | Search time: 0.805 seconds    
 Page:1 2 Next 8
1 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES U.S.A., INC - v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY -- rank: 1000
... to the State, price and other factors considered." See also N.J.S.A. 52:34-12 (reciting the same criteria). The RFP explicitly advised bidders that ... the State's best interest, price and qualifications considered. See N.J.S.A. 52:34-12.1 (authorizing awards to multiple bidders). The security guard services ... Section 7.2.] This standard tracked the applicable procurement statute, N.J.S.A. 52:34-12. Seven addenda to the RFP were issued in April through ... principles of procurement under the State's public bidding laws. N.J.S.A. 52:34-12 prescribes that when the State advertises a contract and accepts ... most advantageous to the State, price and other factors considered[.]" N.J.S.A. 52:34-12. In general, our courts do not interfere with the agency ...
docket: a2608-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-01-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 105192
2 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES U.S.A., INC - v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY -- rank: 1000
... to the State, price and other factors considered." See also N.J.S.A. 52:34-12 (reciting the same criteria). The RFP explicitly advised bidders that ... the State's best interest, price and qualifications considered. See N.J.S.A. 52:34-12.1 (authorizing awards to multiple bidders). The security guard services ... Section 7.2.] This standard tracked the applicable procurement statute, N.J.S.A. 52:34-12. Seven addenda to the RFP were issued in April through ... principles of procurement under the State's public bidding laws. N.J.S.A. 52:34-12 prescribes that when the State advertises a contract and accepts ... most advantageous to the State, price and other factors considered[.]" N.J.S.A. 52:34-12. In general, our courts do not interfere with the agency ...
docket: a0894-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-01-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 105193
3 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES U.S.A., INC v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY -- rank: 1000
... to the State, price and other factors considered." See also N.J.S.A. 52:34-12 (reciting the same criteria). The RFP explicitly advised bidders that ... the State's best interest, price and qualifications considered. See N.J.S.A. 52:34-12.1 (authorizing awards to multiple bidders). The security guard services ... Section 7.2.] This standard tracked the applicable procurement statute, N.J.S.A. 52:34-12. Seven addenda to the RFP were issued in April through ... principles of procurement under the State's public bidding laws. N.J.S.A. 52:34-12 prescribes that when the State advertises a contract and accepts ... most advantageous to the State, price and other factors considered[.]" N.J.S.A. 52:34-12. In general, our courts do not interfere with the agency ...
docket: a5965-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-01-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 103313
4 IN THE MATTER OF CHALLENGE OF THE STATE'S AWARD OF AN OFFICE SUPPLIES CONTRACT TO STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE THROUGH THE NATIONAL JOINT POWERS ALLIANCE -- rank: 917
... with N.J.S.A. 52:34-6.2 and N.J.S.A. 52:34-12; (3) the Director acted arbitrarily, capriciously, and unreasonably and abused ... with N.J.S.A. 52:34-6.2 and N.J.S.A. 52:34-12 lacks merit. N.J.S.A. 52:34-12, which establishes traditional competitive bidding rules that the State must ...
docket: a0476-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-08-25
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 47705
5 IN THE MATTER OF PROTEST OF AWARD OF NEW JERSEY STATE CONTRACT A71188 FOR LIGHT DUTY AUTOMOTIVE PARTS -- rank: 910
... s standards for fair and open competition set forth in N.J.S.A. 52:34-12, since only four suppliers were invited to bid, as contrasted ...
docket: a5626-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2010-04-14
status: published
citation: 422 N.J. Super. 275 28 A.3d 816
Document Size: 69916
6 IN THE MATTER OF MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION SURCHARGE SYSTEM ACCOUNTING AND BILLING SERVICES -- rank: 834
... including the State of Texas. Under the applicable procurement statute, N.J.S.A. 52:34- 12(a)(g), and an associated regulation, N.J.A.C ... 3136-16T2 had the authority to negotiate price reductions under N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a)(f) and N.J.A.C. 17:12-2 ... because the Director's authority to negotiate price reductions under N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a)(f) 'must be expressly set forth in the applicable ...
docket: a3136-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-02-08
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 121174
7 Matthew J. Barrick, Jr. v. State of New Jersey -- rank: 827
... favoritism and corruption, while securing the benefits of unfettered competition. N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a)(g), which governs the advertisement for bids concerning leases ... It stresses the broad discretion vested in the Director by N.J.S.A. 52:34-12 to protect the public interest and obtain for the State ... N.J. Super. 384, 396 (App. Div. 1997) (noting same).] N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a)(g) 5 governs the advertisement for bids concerning leases ... responsive bids is “most advantageous to the State.” N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a). An agency’s choice from among responsible bidders under N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a)(g) is reviewed under the gross abuse of discretion ... Sess. 8-11 (N.J. 2012). 5 Formerly codified at N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(d), amended by L. 1986, c. 72, and N. ...
docket: A-8-13
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2014-07-23
status:
citation: 218 N.J. 247 94 A.3d 895
Document Size: 71778
8 IN THE MATTER OF REQUEST FORPROPOSALS #17DPP00144, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS: PHARMACY BENEFIT MANAGEMENT CONTRACT -- rank: 797
... action,' notwithstanding the broad grant of discretion permitted him by N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a)(g) to select among responsive bids the 'most advantageous ...
docket: a4751-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-05-11
status: published
citation: 454 N.J.Super. 527 186 A.3d 332
Document Size: 188064
9 IN THE MATTER OF PROTEST OF SCHEDULED AWARD OF CONTRACT T0711/RFP 10-X-20725 -- rank: 797
... most advantageous to the State, price and other factors considered. [ N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a)(g).] "Any or all bids may be rejected when ... that it is in the public interest so to do." N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a). The statute contemplates that the lowest bidder may not ...
docket: a6040-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-07-29
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 49961
10 IN THE MATTER OF HIGBEE BEACH RESTORATION PROJECT -- rank: 761
... standard instead of a 'lowest responsive bidder' standard,' citing to N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a)(g). DEP stated that factors such as 'the bidder ... advantageous to the State, price and other factors' standard under N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a)(g). Our review of 'administrative actions is severely limited ... Our Supreme Court has consistently held that contract awards under N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a)(g) should be reviewed under the 'gross abuse of ... J. 539, 548-49 (1966)). This includes contracts awarded under N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a)(g), which permits a contract to be awarded 'to ... most advantageous to the State, price and other factors considered.' N.J.S.A. 52:34- 12(a)(g); Barrick, 218 N.J. at 258; Keyes Martin ...
docket: a1048-22
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2024-01-05
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 37097
11 IN RE PROTEST OF CONTRACT FOR RETAIL PHARMACY DESIGN, -- rank: 735
... 58, N.J.S.A. 52:32-44(b), and N.J.S.A. 52:34-12.2. In addition, the RFP referenced the availability of appellate ...
docket: a1667-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-02-21
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 35954
12 IN THE MATTER OF THE BELLMAWR TRUCK REPAIR COMPANY -- rank: 725
... and repair services for heavy duty vehicles with "reasonable promptness." N.J.S.A. 52:34-12. Because Bellmawr only raised that argument after the Division had ... can hardly be considered 'reasonably prompt' within the meaning of [ N.J.S.A. 52:34-12]." Counsel ended the letter with a request that the Division ... arbitrarily and unduly delayed awarding the [c]ontract," thus violating " N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a)(g)'s mandate to award a state-solicited contract ...
docket: a0801-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-02-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 17327
13 IN RE BID SOLICITATION 16-X-23961, LAUNDRY CHEMICALS STATEWIDE -- rank: 692
... it is in the public interest to do so.' (quoting N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a))). The final issue before us, therefore, is whether the ...
docket: a5379-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-12-14
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20760
14 IN THE MATTER OF THE FAILURE TO AWARD TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER RFP 09-X-20513 CONTRACT T0002 -- rank: 692
... it is in the public interest so to do[,]" under N.J.S.A. 52:34-12, and adding: I determined that, in light of the . . . results ...
docket: a2747-08
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2010-07-02
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 37626
15 IN THE MATTER OF THE BID PROTEST OF AGATE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. -- rank: 635
... most advantageous to the State, price and other factors considered." N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a)(g); see also In re Protest of Award of ... clear. "An agency's choice from among responsible bidders under N.J.S.A. 52:34-12(a)(g) is reviewed under the gross abuse of discretion ...
docket: a1682-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-03-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 31132
 Page:1 2 Next 8
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!