Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 52:34-6")   1 to 14 of 14 results. Run time: 0.667 seconds | Search time: 0.660 seconds    
1 IN THE MATTER OF CHALLENGE OF THE STATE'S AWARD OF AN OFFICE SUPPLIES CONTRACT TO STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE THROUGH THE NATIONAL JOINT POWERS ALLIANCE -- rank: 1000
... and paper to Staples Business Advantage (Staples) 1 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:34-6.2 (the Staples Contract). Appellants are the National Office Products ... appellants argue that: (1) the Director exceeded her authority under N.J.S.A. 52:34-6.2 by negotiating a separate contract with Staples that included ... Jersey-based "Small/Women/Minority Business Enterprises" (SWMBEs)), and violated N.J.S.A. 52:34-6.2b(2) because there is no record she reviewed and ... distribution and marketing plans, and it did not comply with N.J.S.A. 52:34-6.2 and N.J.S.A. 52:34-12; (3 ... that the Staples Contract provided savings to the State; (4) N.J.S.A. 52:34-6.2 does not authorize, and N.J.S.A. 52 ... alternative to the procedures concerning the awarding of public contracts . . . ." N.J.S.A. 52:34-6.2a. The statute permits the Director to "enter into ...
docket: a0476-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-08-25
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 47705
2 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES U.S.A., INC - v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY -- rank: 889
... proposal in response to an advertised RFP administered pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:34-6 et seq., may submit a written protest to the Director ...
docket: a0894-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-01-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 105193
3 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES U.S.A., INC - v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY -- rank: 889
... proposal in response to an advertised RFP administered pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:34-6 et seq., may submit a written protest to the Director ...
docket: a2608-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-01-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 105192
4 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES U.S.A., INC v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY -- rank: 889
... proposal in response to an advertised RFP administered pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:34-6 et seq., may submit a written protest to the Director ...
docket: a5965-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-01-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 103313
5 IN THE MATTER OF PROTEST OF AWARD OF NEW JERSEY STATE CONTRACT A71188 FOR LIGHT DUTY AUTOMOTIVE PARTS -- rank: 872
... first impression because the Director awarded the contract pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:34-6.2, which permits the Director to enter into cooperative purchasing ... Legislature authorized the Director to enter into cooperative purchasing agreements, N.J.S.A. 52:34-6.2. These agreements allow participating states or political subdivisions to ... a more advantageous price or quality of service or both. N.J.S.A. 52:34-6.2a. The Director may elect to purchase goods or services ... this to be the most cost-effective method of procurement." N.J.S.A. 52:34-6.2b(1). Therefore, the Director must "review and approve the ... subdivisions may join as parties to a cooperative purchasing agreement. N.J.S.A. 52:34-6.2c. In 2005, the Legislature authorized the Director to purchase ... or cooperative purchasing groups that utilize a competitive bidding process. N.J.S.A. 52:34-6.2b(2). Here, too, the Director must review and ...
docket: a5626-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2010-04-14
status: published
citation: 422 N.J. Super. 275 28 A.3d 816
Document Size: 69916
6 IN THE MATTER OF PROTEST OF SCHEDULED AWARD OF CONTRACT T0711/RFP 10-X-20725 -- rank: 795
... principles that inform our consideration of the argument. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:34-6, "[a]ll purchases, contracts or agreements, the cost or contract ...
docket: a6040-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-07-29
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 49961
7 IN THE MATTER OF THE 2006 SCREENING CENTER DESIGNATION FOR WARREN COUNTY -- rank: 710
... by way of a Request for Proposal (RFP), pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:34-6. Thus, contrary to the Hospital's contentions, nothing would have ... screening center, the agency will issue a RFP pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:34-6 and solicit applications for designation. Thus, according to Martone: A ...
docket: a6587-05
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-05-23
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 37359
8 DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION v. GEORGE HARMS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. -- rank: 687
... e.g., the LPCL; the CPC; the State Procurement Law, N.J.S.A. 52:34-6 to -27. The compact further states in N.J.S ...
docket: a1484-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-04-04
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 101584
9 CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORP v. DIRECTOR -- rank: 650
... Fund].' The specific appropriation provision states: Notwithstanding the provisions of [N.J.S.A. 52:34-6] or any other law to the contrary, monies appropriated to ... years at issue each provide that: Notwithstanding the provisions of [N.J.S.A. 52:34-6] or any other law to the contrary, monies appropriated to ...
docket: a1537-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-10-12
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 71058
10 IN THE MATTER OF THE 2006 SCREENING CENTER DESIGNATION FOR WARREN COUNTY -- rank: 596
... by way of a Request for Proposal (RFP), pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:34-6. Thus, contrary to the Hospital's contentions, nothing would have ... screening center, the agency will issue a RFP pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:34-6 and solicit applications for designation. Thus, according to Martone: A ...
docket: a0083-06
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-05-23
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 41864
11 COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, ET AL VS CHRISTINE TODD WHITMAN, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL -- rank: 499
... to be, the bidding requirements of the Public Contracts Law, N.J.S.A. 52:34-6 to -19, are manifestly incompatible with the breadth of the ...
docket: a6115-94
court: njappellate
decided: 1997-02-27
status: published
citation: 298 N.J.Super. 162
Document Size: 37185
12 BID SOLICITATION #08-X-39458 ADVERTISING AND PUBLIC RELATIONS SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SENIOR SERVICES -- rank: 454
... scheme that governs the award of State contracts. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:34-6, "[a]ll purchases, contracts or agreements, the cost or contract ...
docket: a0282-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2009-02-05
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 43881
13 IN THE MATTER OF THE BID PROTEST OF AGATE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. -- rank: 446
... that DEP was entitled to award the contract pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:34-6, which governs bidding for "[a]ll . . . contracts" where the "contract ...
docket: a1682-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-03-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 31132
14 IN THE MATTER OF THE FAILURE TO AWARD TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER RFP 09-X-20513 CONTRACT T0002 -- rank: 423
... 1 to -51 and not under the State bidding laws, N.J.S.A. 52:34-6 to -25 However, we discern no reason why the same ...
docket: a2747-08
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2010-07-02
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 37626
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!