Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 PAUL KAMIENSKI v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY -- rank: 1000

... imprisonment, or after the grant of a pardon to him." N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4. The plain language bars persons who are currently serving a ...

docket:	a4816-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-08-16
status:	published
citation:	451 N.J.Super. 499 169 A.3d 493
Document Size:	97222

2 RON MILLS -- rank: 839

... complaint had not been verified by plaintiffs, as required by N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4. He asserted that their failure to verify the complaint raised ... disposition of this appeal. II. The State argues that, because N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4 requires a verified complaint, the motion judge lacked subject matter ... prior to the expiration of the limitation period established by N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4. The two-year limitation period had already expired as to ... amend the complaint to correct the error and comply with N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4. Rule 4:9-1 permits a party to amend a ...

docket:	a3234-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-13
status:	published
citation:	435 N.J.Super. 69 86 A.3d 741
Document Size:	48211

3 DION HARRELL v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY -- rank: 779

... release from imprisonment'1 as specifically prescribed by the MIA. N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4. 1 The MIA also permits an individual to file within ... after the grant of a pardon,' a circumstance inapplicable here. N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4. A-3628-18T3 2 Relying on Watson v. N.J ... imprisonment, or after the grant of a pardon to him . . . .' N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4. For individuals like Harrell whose release preceded the MIA's ...

docket:	a3628-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-02-25
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39093

4 JOHN WATSON v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY -- rank: 637

... complaint and the trial court's interpretation of the Act, N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4. When interpreting a statute, our 'overriding goal is to give ... imprisonment, or after the grant of a pardon to him. [ N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4 (emphasis added).] 8 A-5627-15T4 Here, the plain language ...

docket:	a5627-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-12-29
status:	published
citation:	453 N.J.Super. 42 179 A.3d 1061
Document Size:	32304

5 ESTATE OF CURTIS KNIGHT v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY -- rank: 622

... than two years after plaintiff's release from imprisonment. See N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4. Defendant argues: (1) that his claim did not accrue until ... two years after his release from imprisonment" as required by N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4. The judge found no basis for equitable tolling or a ...

docket:	A2900-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-03-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36075

6 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4511-17.opn.html -- rank: 607

... imprisonment, or after the grant of a pardon to him.' N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4. Here, Sapio did not file suit within two years after ... year limitations period for asserting a claim under the Act. N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4. Of course, he could not bring a claim at that ... imprisonment, or after the grant of a pardon to him[.]' N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4. In Watson v. New Jersey Dep't of Treasury, 453 ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	14658

7 WILLIAM GRAHAM v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY -- rank: 592

... did not file suit within the time limit established by N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4. Following oral argument on August 22, the motion judge granted ... Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. , 202 N.J. 369 , 385 (2010). N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4 provides that suit [under the Act] . . . shall be brought by ... two years later. Consequently, a plain-language reading of the N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4 would require an affirmance of the dismissal on statute of limitations grounds. Graham argues that the limitation period in N.J.S.A. 52:4C-4 should be interpreted to permit the filing of suit within ...

docket:	a0539-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13449