Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 JAMES BARACIA v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE STATE POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM - -- rank: 1000

... Board) issued on March 23, 2010. That decision held that N.J.S.A. 53:5A-38.1(b) required a dollar-for-dollar offset from petitioner ... 27,482.70, the Board relied upon the provisions of N.J.S.A. 53:5A-38.1(b). As a consequence, petitioner's monthly retirement allowance ... and future benefits to the employer. Petitioner further maintains that N.J.S.A. 53:5A-38.1(b) does not permit a reduction in petitioner's ... payment of the $27,482.72 under the authority of N.J.S.A. 53:5A-38.1(b), which provides in pertinent part as follows: An ... 482.70, was not a periodic benefit as contemplated under N.J.S.A. 53:5A-38.1(b). In fact, the order entered by the workers ... Board cannot offset petitioner's accidental disability retirement allowance under N.J.S.A. 53:5A-38.1(b) by the amount of the attorney's ...

docket:	a3611-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-13
status:	published
citation:	420 N.J. Super. 1 18 A.3d 220
Document Size:	20900

2 Annie James v. Board of Trustees, Public Employees Retirement System -- rank: 468

... 2, and members of the State Police Retirement Systems under N.J.S.A. 53:5A-38.1. Footnote: 3 Although not in the record before us ...

docket:	a3189-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	1999-04-30
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	35819