Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 CITY OF EAST ORANGE v. 280 SOUTH HARRISON STREET ASSOCIATES -- rank: 1000

... as that provided on the exempt list for the property. N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.27; 18 Washington Place Assocs. v. City of Newark , 8 N ... an assessed valuation under Corrado and Jabert . Nevertheless, because of N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.27's mandate that formerly exempt property be returned to the ... assessed valuation since it is bound by the mandate of N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.27 to apply the assessor’s valuation to the property when ... relitigating the issue. Finally, the assessor was not authorized under N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.27 to make an assessment other than at the value placed ... to appeal the July 1995 judgment, then failed to follow N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.27's mandate by making its added assessment at the original ... will become the assessment once a property becomes taxable under N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.27, the logic behind the 1991 amendment would support a ...

docket:	00545-96
court:
decided:	1997-06-24
status:
citation:	16 N.J. Tax 424
Document Size:	63799

2 TOWNSHIP OF FREEHOLD, v. CENTRASTATE HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., -- rank: 759

... exempt list. See also the EC provision in this regard, N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.27. 16 January 2018 Orders were interlocutory, and when it continued ...

docket:	00047-16
court:	NJ Tax Court
decided:	2021-01-05
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	43827

3 TEICHER AMERICAN COMMUNITIES AT THE MAJESTIC, LLC v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK -- rank: 599

... changes ownership, the property "shall be assessable as omitted property." N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.27 provides: The valuation of any such property for the purpose ...

docket:	a5283-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-04-02
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	32354