Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a_92_93_15.opn.html -- rank: 1000

... that the defendant restaurants committed a regulatory violation by contravening N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5. Under that section of the CFA, it is an â ... failed to meet their “clearly established” legal responsibilities under N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5; they contend that the statute required defendants to “plainly ... assert, among other claims, that TGIF violated a regulatory provision, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5, by selling, attempting to sell, or offering for sale â ... purchase.” (citing N.J.S.A. 56:12-15; N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5). The Dugan plaintiffs demand damages, civil penalties, and other relief ... regulatory violation claim based on OSI’s alleged contravention of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5 and a more general CFA claim based on OSI’s ... under the TCCWNA, based on OSI’s claimed violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5, and sought damages and civil penalties under that statute. ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	210705

2 Debra Dugan v. TGI Fridays, Inc. -- rank: 987

... that the defendant restaurants committed a regulatory violation by contravening N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5. Under that section of the CFA, it is an â ... failed to meet their “clearly established” legal responsibilities under N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5; they contend that the statute required defendants to “plainly ... assert, among other claims, that TGIF violated a regulatory provision, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5, by selling, attempting to sell, or offering for sale â ... purchase.” (citing N.J.S.A. 56:12-15; N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5). The Dugan plaintiffs demand damages, civil penalties, and other relief ... regulatory violation claim based on OSI’s alleged contravention of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5 and a more general CFA claim based on OSI’s ... under the TCCWNA, based on OSI’s claimed violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5, and sought damages and civil penalties under that statute. ...

docket:	a-92-15
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2017-10-04
status:
citation:
Document Size:	210799

3 DEBRA DUGAN v. TGI FRIDAY'S, INC -- rank: 698

... bait and switch" and (2) an unlawful practice countermanded by N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5 (requiring all merchandise sold at retail to be accompanied by ... to the exclusion of the CFA; (2) the CFA (specifically, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5) does not require price disclosure of beverages on menus; (3 ... and unavoidable conflict with the CFA's statutory price disclosure, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5, or its overarching surveillance of sharp business practices. Prohibiting deceptive ... fails to state a viable CFA claim. Dugan argues that N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5 is the source of her authority, notwithstanding the more specific ... to -25 (UPDA), which TGIF says trumps Dugan's claim. N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5 provides: It shall be an unlawful practice for any person ... beverages are not embraced within the definition of merchandise in N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5. It proceeds on the assumption that because the UPDA, ...

docket:	a3098-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-10-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47596

4 ROBERT CAMERON v. TGI FRIDAYS, INC -- rank: 648

... support a claim under the CFA, specifically a violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5, which mandates point-of-sale disclosure of the price of ... menus for certain beverages. Plaintiffs allege TGIF's practice violates N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5, and constitutes an unconscionable commercial practice in violation of N ...

docket:	a3485-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-03-24
status:	published
citation:	445 N.J.Super. 59 135 A.3d 1003
Document Size:	51654

5 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT DWAYNE GREEN -- rank: 590

... at the point where the merchandise is offered for sale. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5.] On the day for which appellant was cited, it had ... the vehicles, but contended it satisfied the alternative requirement of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5 because the price list was in the sales office, which ... that the Division's interpretation of the alternative provision of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5 was erroneous, and that its practice of maintaining a price ... principles we consider the specific CFA provision at issue here. N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5 was added to the CFA in 1973. L. 1973, c ... purchase. The Director concluded that "[t]he legislative purpose of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5 is precisely to prevent the type of sales program described ... the installment payments." He found it "apparent . . . that by enacting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5, the [L]egislature has rejected that paternalistic point of ...

docket:	a1892-07_1
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-06-07
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	59635

6 IN THE MATTER OF JOHNNY POPPER, INC. -- rank: 590

... at the point where the merchandise is offered for sale. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5.] On the day for which appellant was cited, it had ... the vehicles, but contended it satisfied the alternative requirement of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5 because the price list was in the sales office, which ... that the Division's interpretation of the alternative provision of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5 was erroneous, and that its practice of maintaining a price ... principles we consider the specific CFA provision at issue here. N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5 was added to the CFA in 1973. L. 1973, c ... purchase. The Director concluded that "[t]he legislative purpose of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5 is precisely to prevent the type of sales program described ... the installment payments." He found it "apparent . . . that by enacting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.5, the [L]egislature has rejected that paternalistic point of ...

docket:	a4398-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-06-09
status:	published
citation:	413 N.J. Super. 580 997 A.2d 257
Document Size:	57726