4 Results for [("N.J.S.A. 56:9-18")]

Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

Results for ("N.J.S.A. 56:9-18") 1 to 4 of 4 results.

Run time: 0.677 seconds | Search time: 0.670 seconds

1 KUMAR R. PATEL, M.D. v. JAIME R. SORIANO, M.D., et al. -- rank: 1000

... 175 (App. Div.), certif. denied , 141 N.J. 99 (1995). N.J.S.A. 56:9-18 mandates that the Act "shall be construed in harmony with ...

docket:	a4239-01
court:	njappellate
decided:	2004-05-18
status:	published
citation:	369 N.J. Super. 192
Document Size:	129686

2 LOUIS SICKLES v. CABOT CORPORATION, et al. -- rank: 973

... federal antitrust law in interpreting our own antitrust statute. See N.J.S.A. 56:9-18 ("This act shall be construed in harmony with ruling judicial ... claims under the ATA based on the harmonizing provision of N.J.S.A. 56:9-18 and the Supreme Court's holding in Illinois Brick , which ... on the holding in Illinois Brick , the harmonization clause of N.J.S.A. 56:9-18, and the failed attempt by our Legislature to amend the ... to pursue. Our Legislature specifically incorporated federal precedent, providing in N.J.S.A. 56:9-18 that the ATA "shall be construed in harmony with ruling ...

docket:	A3129-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-07-07
status:	published
citation:	379 N.J. Super. 100 877 A.2d 267
Document Size:	88229

3 ROBERT WILSON, Individually et al. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, et al. -- rank: 694

... harmony with ruling judicial interpretations of comparable Federal antitrust statutes." N.J.S.A. 56:9-18. One of the best known and certainly one of the ... federal statute and with its interpretation in the federal courts. N.J.S.A. 56:9-18. Our Legislature has not altered the requirement that our antitrust ...

docket:	A0943-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-06-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	123832

4 Richard M. Wilson v. General Motors Corporation, et al. -- rank: 584

... federal antitrust law in interpreting our own antitrust statute,” see N.J.S.A. 56:9-18, and under Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois , 431 U.S ...

docket:	a-58-06
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2007-03-20
status:
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	17816