Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 KUMAR R. PATEL, M.D. v. JAIME R. SORIANO, M.D., et al. -- rank: 1000

... judge found that IGH was immune from such liability under N.J.S.A. 56:9-3 sets forth the underlying proscriptive conduct: "Every contract, combination in ... Super. 175 , 188 (App. Div. 1994). The federal analog to N.J.S.A. 56:9-3, the restraint of trade provision, is § 1 of the Sherman ... footnote 12 Plaintiff urges that his claim is viable under N.J.S.A. 56:9-3 and invokes the "per se" rule of liability. Unfortunately, we ... state or federal law. IGH is immune by virtue of N.J.S.A. 56:9-3, a plaintiff must prove the existence of a conspiracy in ... action, regardless of its motivation, cannot constitute a violation of N.J.S.A. 56:9-3. Id. at 187 n.3 (citing Edward J. Sweeney & Sons ... concerted action element of a restraint of trade claim under N.J.S.A. 56:9-3. The trial judge found that defendant acted in a ...

docket:	a4239-01
court:	njappellate
decided:	2004-05-18
status:	published
citation:	369 N.J. Super. 192
Document Size:	129686

2 THE ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY CHIROPRACTORS, INC v. HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC. -- rank: 829

... of trade under the analogous provision of our Antitrust Act, N.J.S.A. 56:9-3, we need not address the basis for the court's ...

docket:	a6033-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-11-04
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	63649

3 IMO Alleged Violations of Valley Road Sewerage Company et als. -- rank: 746

... to rig bids on garbage collection contracts, in violation of N.J.S.A. 56:9-3. Id. at 648-49. As a result of appellant's ...

docket:	a-76-97
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1998-06-12
status:
citation:	154 N.J. 224
Document Size:	77309

4 FANELLI V. CITY OF TRENTON -- rank: 696

... 1 , 2, and the comparable New Jersey antitrust statutes. See N.J.S.A. 56:9-3, -4. We conclude that the "state action" doctrine immunizes the ...

docket:	a-82-93
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1994-06-07
status:
citation:	135 N.J. 582
Document Size:	35498

5 EPIX HOLDINGS CORPORATION v. MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES INC., -- rank: 669

... arising from this transaction under the New Jersey Antitrust Act, N.J.S.A. 56:9-3 including restraint of trade, price-fixing, unfair business practices, civil ... of trade or commerce, in this State, shall be unlawful." N.J.S.A. 56:9-3. Although its legislative history is sparse, Kimmelman v. Henkels , 108 ...

docket:	a3059-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-11-17
status:	published
citation:	410 N.J. Super. 453 982 A.2d 1194
Document Size:	117045

6 Richard M. Wilson v. General Motors Corporation, et al. -- rank: 516

... do not expressly state “causes of action [in] violation of N.J.S.A. 56:9-3,” as do the Williams and Tatte complaints. However, the Wilson ...

docket:	a-58-06
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2007-03-20
status:
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	17816