Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION -- rank: 1000

... 11 to  23.11z (Spill Act). We must determine whether N.J.S.A. 58:10B-17.1 (the extension statute) applies to a claim for relief based ... claims for nuisance and trespass, and that the extension statute, N.J.S.A. 58:10B-17.1, did not apply. The judge granted that motion, and DEP ... months next after the cause of action shall have accrued. [ N.J.S.A. 58:10B-17.1(b)(1) (emphasis added).] When it was initially enacted in ... compel a person to perform remediation activities on contaminated property [.] [ N.J.S.A. 58:10B-17.1(c) (emphasis added).] In its January 22, 2009 letter opinion ... s common law claims for nuisance and trespass, and that N.J.S.A. 58:10B-17.1 did not apply. Defendant had argued that DEP was required ... compel a person to perform remediation activities on contaminated property[.]" N.J.S.A. 58:10B-17.1(c). The term "or regulation" refers to a duly ...

docket:	a0314-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-31
status:	published
citation:	420 N.J. Super. 395 22 A.3d 1
Document Size:	55244

2 State of NJDEP v. Caldeira, et al. -- rank: 831

... one-year discovery provision for actions alleging actual fraud, and N.J.S.A . 58:10B-17.1, a statute of limitations specific to certain environmental claims. (Pp ... State. (Pp. 17-21) The recently enacted site remediation statute, N.J.S.A . 58:10B-17.1, is inapplicable here because the action is not one that ... We turn next to the recently enacted site remediation statute, N.J.S.A. 58:10B-17.1(a), that the DEP proffers as an alternative basis to ... by the State pursuant to the State’s environmental laws.” N.J.S.A. 58:10B-17.1(a). The DEP argues that its UFTA action is really ...

docket:	a-13-01
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2002-04-08
status:
citation:	171 N.J. 404
Document Size:	45374