Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 TAC Associates v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al. -- rank: 1000

... real property" on which there has been a discharge. Under N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6, innocent persons who "own real property" on which there has ... that person qualifies for an innocent party grant pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6]. [ N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6, in turn, reiterates the ownership requirement and sets forth what ... innocent party, was inconsistent with the definition of ownership in N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(a)(4). The Appellate Division reversed and remanded. Without addressing ... argue that N.J.S.A. 58:10B-5 and N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6 provide that an IPG is available only to "persons who ... 31-8.2 is inconsistent with the statutory definition in N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(b)(4)[ and] declare[d] N.J.A.C. ...

docket:	a-57-09
court:	supreme
decided:	2010-07-15
status:
citation:	202 N.J. 533 998 A.2d 450
Document Size:	79823

2 IN THE MATTER OF HAZARDOUS DISCHARGE SITE REMEDIATION GRANT APPLICATION – 50 INNOCENT PARTY GRANT -- rank: 911

... to an 'innocent party,' as the term was defined in N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(a)(4) (2010). To receive funding, an applicant had to ... Despite this, since the applicant had been in accordance with N.J.S.A. 58:10B- 6 at the time of the original [IPG] award, and the ... property to determine eligibility to receive an IPG. Ibid. Under N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(a)(4) (2010), '[a] person qualifies for an [IPG] if ... supplemental IPG funding in 2009, the DEP, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(a)(4) and TAC Assocs., approved the request in April ... that, 'since Pastor Enterprises … has been in accordance with N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6 at the time of the original grant reward, . . . Pastor Enterprises ... subsidy to clean-up environmentally contaminated property satisfying specific criteria. N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6. As noted above, the record is devoid of any ...

docket:	a3496-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26161

3 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2844-16.opn.html -- rank: 900

... to an 'innocent party,' as that term was defined in N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(a)(4) (2010). To receive funding, an applicant had to ... substances at the area where the historic discharge was discovered. N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(a)(4) (2010). When DEP determined that an IPG grant ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	20377

4 IN THE MATTER OF HAZARDOUS DISCHARGE SITE REMEDIATION FUND PUBLIC ENTITY GRANT APPLICATION FOR REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION AND REMEDIAL ACTION -- rank: 878

... application. Alternatively, DEP contends it properly denied the application under N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6. Initially, we dispense with DEP's argument that Rosengarten lacks ...

docket:	a4439-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-08-29
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21464

5 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/tax/09227-10.opn.html -- rank: 846

... discharge any hazardous substances or hazardous wastes on the property. N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(a)(4). Thus, no “‘windfall tax benefit’â ... discharge any hazardous substances or hazardous wastes on the property. N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(a)(4). * This archive is a service of Rutgers School ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	71665

6 IN THE MATTER OF HAZARDOUS DISCHARGE SITE REMEDIATION FUND -- rank: 768

... Cliflake applied for the innocent party grant in January 2011. N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(a)(4) establishes the following qualifications for the grant: A ... The issue is whether Cliflake satisfied the requirement, found in N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(a)(4), that it have "acquired the property prior to ... should be considered the same entity for the purposes of N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(a)(4). 1 DEP took the position that, because there ...

docket:	a4685-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-05-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39372

7 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 CEDAR KNOLLS 2006, LLC v. -- rank: 704

... hazardous waste at an area where a discharge is discovered. [ N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(a)(4).] The DEP communicated a tentative decision to Cedar ... a)(17), and qualifies Cedar Knolls as a person under N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(a)(4), as a result of Robert's purchase of ... transfers to Cedar Knolls qualifies it as a "person" under N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(a)(4), to receive an innocent party grant to remediate ...

docket:	a1405-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-05-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22683

8 IN THE MATTER OF DENIAL OF CEDAR KNOLLS 2006 LLC'S HAZARDOUS DISCHARGE SITE REMEDIATION FUND INNOCENT PARTY GRANT APPLICATION WITH REGARD TO REIMBURSEMENT OF REMEDIAL ACTION COSTS -- rank: 701

... that Cedar Knolls did not qualify as a 'person' under N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(a)(4) to submit an innocent party grant to pay ... which authorizes funding for governmental subsidy of environmentally contaminated property. N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6. Lastly, this court does not have the authority to second ...

docket:	a3151-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-12-05
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25574