Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 IN THE MATTER OF GREEN BROOK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT -- rank: 1000

... or the public utility. We conclude that the directive of N.J.S.A. 58:16A-8, that the total cost of any relocation of utility facilities ... requires the removal, relocation and reconstruction of public utility facilities. N.J.S.A. 58:16A-8. However, an order by the Commissioner for the relocation of ... considered as a part of the cost of the work. [ N.J.S.A. 58:16A-8 (emphasis added).]     This section has not been interpreted in any ... this appeal involves solely the interpretation of the language of N.J.S.A. 58:16A-8, considered in light of certain other sections of the original ... to the term "work" in the Act other than in N.J.S.A. 58:16A-8 is contained in N.J.S.A. 58:16A-5 ... any different significance to the term "work" as used in N.J.S.A. 58:16A-8. Thus, the evident intent of the directive that the ...

docket:	A3203-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2004-06-22
status:	published
citation:	370 N.J. Super. 122 850 A.2d 456
Document Size:	25210

2 IN THE MATTER OF GREEN BROOK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT -- rank: 1000

... or the public utility. We conclude that the directive of N.J.S.A. 58:16A-8, that the total cost of any relocation of utility facilities ... requires the removal, relocation and reconstruction of public utility facilities. N.J.S.A. 58:16A-8. However, an order by the Commissioner for the relocation of ... considered as a part of the cost of the work. [ N.J.S.A. 58:16A-8 (emphasis added).]     This section has not been interpreted in any ... this appeal involves solely the interpretation of the language of N.J.S.A. 58:16A-8, considered in light of certain other sections of the original ... to the term "work" in the Act other than in N.J.S.A. 58:16A-8 is contained in N.J.S.A. 58:16A-5 ... any different significance to the term "work" as used in N.J.S.A. 58:16A-8. Thus, the evident intent of the directive that the ...

docket:	A3231-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2004-06-22
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	25178