Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 59:10-2")   1 to 9 of 9 results. Run time: 0.754 seconds | Search time: 0.747 seconds    
1 Chasin v. Montclair State University -- rank: 1000
... fails to establish . . . actual fraud, actual malice or willful misconduct." N.J.S.A. 59:10-2. If an employee qualifies under that provision, the State is ... 10A-2 applies. Id. at 498. Helduser also relied on N.J.S.A. 59:10-2, asserting that it mandated reimbursement for his counsel fees when ... position.     Because Chasin was not entitled to a defense under N.J.S.A. 59:10-2 requires the State to indemnify an employee when the Attorney ... erroneously applied one of the first two exceptions.      To summarize, N.J.S.A. 59:10-2 requires the State to indemnify an employee in a N ... Chasin sought injunctive relief, it was outside the scope of N.J.S.A. 59:10-2. Accordingly, the TCA does not require the Attorney General to ... S.A. 59:10-1 (“the State shall provide indemnification. . . .”); N.J.S.A. 59:10-2 (“the State shall pay or reimburse him. . . .”); N.J. ...
docket: a-161-97
court: njsupreme
decided: 1999-06-02
status:
citation: 159 N.J. 418
Document Size: 97874
2 Daniel Prado v. State of New Jersey, New Jersey Department of Labor, etc.,et al. -- rank: 921
... or willful misconduct, contrary to the legislative intent expressed in N.J.S.A. 59:10-2.” Prado , supra , 376 N.J. Super. at 242. For that ... act because of actual fraud, actual malice or willful misconduct. [ N.J.S.A. 59:10-2.] The right to indemnification thus is a counterweight to the ...
docket: a-33-05
court: njsupreme
decided: 2006-05-08
status:
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 56250
3 Daniel Prado v. State of New Jersey, New Jersey Department of Labor, etc.,et al. -- rank: 921
... or willful misconduct, contrary to the legislative intent expressed in N.J.S.A. 59:10-2.” Prado , supra , 376 N.J. Super. at 242. For that ... act because of actual fraud, actual malice or willful misconduct. [ N.J.S.A. 59:10-2.] The right to indemnification thus is a counterweight to the ...
docket: a-33-05
court: njsupreme
decided: 2006-05-08
status:
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 56208
4 Isaac Wright v. State of New Jersey et als. -- rank: 905
... N.J.S.A. 59:10-1 (emphasis added).]          Moreover, N.J.S.A. 59:10-2 provides that             [i]f the Attorney General refuses to provide ... willful misconduct, see N.J.S.A. 59:10A- and N.J.S.A. 59:10-2, and we leave to the trial court to determine on ...
docket: a-54-00
court: njsupreme
decided: 2001-07-31
status:
citation: 169 N.J. 422
Document Size: 121292
5 DANIEL PRADO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 873
... provide representation to a State employee or former State employee, N.J.S.A. 59:10-2 entitles the employee or former employee to indemnification for all ... employment or constituted actual fraud, willful misconduct or actual malice. N.J.S.A. 59:10-2 provides in pertinent part: If the Attorney General refuses to ... or willful misconduct, contrary to the legislative intent expressed in N.J.S.A. 59:10-2, . . . N.J.S.A. 59:10A-1 should be construed ... S.A. 59:10A-1 but instead seeks indemnification under N.J.S.A. 59:10-2 for the defense costs he had to incur as a ... representation. Although the grounds for the State denying indemnification under N.J.S.A. 59:10-2 "parallel[] the first two exceptions to the defense provision, listed ... hand, the determination whether the State has a duty under N.J.S.A. 59:10-2 to indemnify a State employee for defense costs, after ...
docket: a6273-03
court: njappellate
decided: 2006-10-17
status: published
citation: 376 N.J. Super. 231
Document Size: 91874
6 IN THE MATTER OF REQUEST FOR DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION IN JAMES BAYLISS v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE TROOPER R. WAMBOLD JR. -- rank: 784
... not that one of the three exceptions set forth in N.J.S.A. 59:10-2 applies." Id. at 427. The AAG wrote that continued representation ... reimbursement for the reasonable cost, if any, of his defense. N.J.S.A. 59:10-2; Lavezzi v. State , 219 N.J. 163 , 173 (2014). Appellant ...
docket: a6043-11
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-06-17
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 43298
7 Bower v. Board of Education of the City of East Orange -- rank: 642
... embodied in the amendment to the police indemnification statute. Thus, N.J.S.A. 59:10-2.1 provides:             If any criminal action is instituted against any ...
docket: a-88-96
court: njsupreme
decided: 1997-06-10
status:
citation: 149 N.J. 416
Document Size: 78721
8 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a-21-19.opn.html -- rank: 631
... and the State, and undertook the task of 5 See N.J.S.A. 59:10-2. 24 clarifying when the State must defend and indemnify county ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 65513
9 IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF THE LICENSE OF JOHN JOSEPH NAPOLEON, ET ALS -- rank: 465
... s argument that he is entitled to indemnification pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:10-2. This provision only applies to indemnification for damages awarded in ...
docket: a1939-95
court: njappellate
decided: 1997-08-14
status: published
citation: 303 N.J.Super. 630
Document Size: 13842

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!