Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0632-12xx.opn.html -- rank: 1000

... the statutory notice requirement of the Contractual Liability Act (CLA), N.J.S.A. 59:13-5, asserting that they had contractual, statutory, and constitutional rights to ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	136163

2 THOMAS CANNAVO v. HON CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE -- rank: 1000

... the statutory notice requirement of the Contractual Liability Act (CLA), N.J.S.A. 59:13-5, asserting that they had contractual, statutory, and constitutional rights to ...

docket:	a6002-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-26
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	137144

3 THOMAS CANNAVO v. HON CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE -- rank: 1000

... the statutory notice requirement of the Contractual Liability Act (CLA), N.J.S.A. 59:13-5, asserting that they had contractual, statutory, and constitutional rights to ...

docket:	a5973-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-26
status:	published
citation:	436 N.J.Super. 220 93 A.3d 387
Document Size:	137311

4 County of Morris v. Fauver -- rank: 874

... the State within ninety days of the claim's accrual. N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. Because the Appellate Division believed that the State was the ... agency within ninety days of the accrual of their claim. N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. Failure to file a notice of claim within the appropriate ... reason” for permission to file a late notice of claim. N.J.S.A. 59:13-5-6. If permission is granted, the notice of claim must ...

docket:	a-59-97
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1998-03-09
status:
citation:	153 N.J. 80
Document Size:	97147

5 RUFINA ASOLUKA UNEZE v. GREYSTONE PARK PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL -- rank: 786

... implied contract and covenant and invaded her privacy. Defendants contended N.J.S.A. 59:13-5 bars 'recovery against the State for claims based upon contracts ... ninety days of the accrual of the claim required by N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. Defendants pointed out that plaintiff only filed a notice of ... covenant of good faith and fair dealing were barred under N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. We concur. More fundamentally, plaintiff has not shown that defendants ...

docket:	a4301-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-03-11
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44608

6 DR. EZEGOZIE EZE v. ROWAN UNIVERSITY -- rank: 756

... arguing that he substantially complied with the notice requirements of N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. We agree and reverse. I We glean the following facts ... dismissal of his contractual claims for failure to comply with N.J.S.A. 59:13-5 (emphasis added) provides as follows: It shall be the responsibility ... of accrual of his claim except as otherwise provided in [ N.J.S.A. 59:13-5] hereof; or b. he fails to file suit within 2 ... satisfied that Eze substantially complied with the notice requirements of N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. See Anske v. Borough of Palisades Park , 139 N.J ... be two years from the date of accrual pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. Because the statute of limitations was not the basis of ... prejudice for failure to comply with the notice provisions of N.J.S.A. 59:13-5, but only as the claims sounding in contract. We ...

docket:	a2659-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-02-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47772

7 VIVIAN SHNAIDMAN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES -- rank: 746

... Liability Act. See N.J.S.A. 59:8-8; N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. Defendants moved for summary judgment. After hearing argument, the trial ...

docket:	a4120-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	77463

8 IRENE & WILLIAM LINDENMUTH VS ROBERT HOLDEN -- rank: 737

... contract within ninety days of the accrual of the claim. N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. Failure to do so within ninety days results in a ... to only the ninety-day period before its notice under N.J.S.A. 59:13-5 because nothing indicates that the County knew or should have ...

docket:	a4845-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-12-17
status:	published
citation:	296 N.J.Super. 42
Document Size:	38677

9 COUNTY OF HUDSON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS -- rank: 728

... not file a timely notice of claim as required by N.J.S.A. 59:13-5 and, on that ground, concluded that its entire action was ... its two new county correctional facilities for state prisoners. See N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. While we agree that those claims were barred because they ... result in the submission of a claim against the State." N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. "[N]o notice of claim for breach of contract, either ... to satisfy Hudson's obligation to give notice pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. The notice must be given to the "contracting agency" and ... and the total dollar amount of the claim if known." N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. The purpose is to give the State time to investigate ... DOC, the contracting agency, and includes the information required by N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. It identifies the County of Hudson as the claimant. ...

docket:	a3511-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-06-28
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	27442

10 JIYOUNG SON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 698

... to provide the notice required by the Act, as per N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. The judge entered an implementing order on the same day ... of that date under the notice provision of the CLA, N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. To the extent plaintiffs were seeking to state a claim ...

docket:	a0337-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-01-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16304

11 NEW JERSEY HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENT ASSISTANCE AUTHORITY v. GENNIFER A. STRIBLING -- rank: 692

... contract, the promissory note. Thus, the claim is subject to N.J.S.A. 59:13-5, which provides as follows, in pertinent part: It shall be ...

docket:	a1260-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-03-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29309

12 PHILLIP A. DIXON v. JPAY, INC. -- rank: 676

... to the New Jersey Contractual Liability Act is without merit. N.J.S.A. 59:13-5 provides, in relevant part, as follows: It shall be the ... of accrual of his claim except as otherwise provided in [N.J.S.A. 59:13-5] hereof[.] [N.J.S.A. 59:13-5(a).] The notice provision is 'specifically intended to give state ... of the statute by filing a timely notice pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:13-5, the trial court properly dismissed plaintiff's claim given that ...

docket:	a4498-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-05-13
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21569

13 SUSAN H. KOCH v. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 652

... claim is barred. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8; N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. Furthermore, a court cannot allow a plaintiff to file a ...

docket:	a1635-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25197

14 D.J. MILLER & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT TREASURY, DIVISION OF PURCHASE AND PROPERTY -- rank: 615

... than 90 days after the accrual of such a claim." N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. Thus, the Division's contract with appellant not only purports ... following the filing of a notice of claim, during which N.J.S.A. 59:13-5 requires a claimant to withhold filing suit, expired without a ...

docket:	a4910-01
court:	njappellate
decided:	2002-12-23
status:	published
citation:	356 N.J. Super. 187
Document Size:	15902

15 CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES INC v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DIVISION OF PURCHASE AND PROPERTY, CONTRACT COMPLIANCE AUDIT UNIT -- rank: 600

... on November 20, 2008. The notice was filed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:13-5, a provision within the CLA which states that "[a]fter ... days after serving its notice of claim as required by N.J.S.A. 59:13-5. After hearing oral argument, Assignment Judge Linda R. Feinberg granted ...

docket:	a3820-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-04-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18669