Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Paris Wilson v. City of Jersey City -- rank: 1000

... A. 59:2-3(d) (immunity for discretionary activities) and N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 (limitation on public-entity liability) and to Petersen and Murdaugh ...

docket:	A-61-10
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2012-03-08
status:
citation:
Document Size:	181254

2 ERICA TURNER v. TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON -- rank: 874

... operators for conduct that is not wanton and willful, and N.J.S.A. 59:2-10, a general Tort Claims Act provision which immunizes public entities ... discussion of the immunity provisions of the Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. This appeal follows, in which the Township argues that the ... J.S.A. 59:1-1 to -12-3, specifically N.J.S.A. 59:2-10, collectively considered, immunize the public employer from civil liability for ... the TCA's limitation on public entity liability contained in N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 ("A public entity is not liable for the acts or ... persons," the Township is not vicariously liable by virtue of N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. Nothing in Wilson is to the contrary. Nonetheless, plaintiffs emphasize ... holding was limited accordingly. The immunity defense of the TCA, N.J.S.A. 59:2-10, was not before the Court and therefore was never ...

docket:	a5478-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-23
status:	published
citation:	430 N.J.Super. 274 63 A.3d 1233
Document Size:	39752

3 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2752-20.opn.html -- rank: 818

... acts or omissions of a public employee constituting a crime . . .,' N.J.S.A. 59:2- -10 – that the board argues are not immunities and remain ... deprived the board of its Tort Claims Act immunities; and N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 and N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) are ... A. 59:2-1.3(a)(1), but also whether N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 and N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) should ... that the board claims are not immunities. We conclude that N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 is an immunity but N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) is not. The board's argument about N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 has no merit. The board relies heavily if not exclusively ... among other things, an employee's crimes. To hold that N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 remains applicable in those cases in which N.J. ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	40218

4 LUZ F. ALVAREZ v. BOROUGH OF HOBOKEN -- rank: 785

... constituting a crime, actual fraud, actual malice, or willful misconduct." N.J.S.A. 59:2-10.   Hoboken would be accountable for its employees' negligent conduct. See ...

docket:	a4782-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-08-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	67627

5 LUZ F. ALVAREZ v. BOROUGH OF HOBOKEN -- rank: 785

... constituting a crime, actual fraud, actual malice, or willful misconduct." N.J.S.A. 59:2-10.   Hoboken would be accountable for its employees' negligent conduct. See ...

docket:	a4534-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-08-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	67627

6 Sopharie Leang, et al. v. Jersey City Board of Education, et al. -- rank: 749

... the Board for any of these intentional torts because of N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. See Seal Tite Corp. v. Bressi , 312 N.J. Super ...

docket:	a-21-08
court:
decided:	2009-04-16
status:
citation:	198 N.J. 557
Document Size:	124015

7 IN THE MATTER OF DOUGLAS TUBBY -- rank: 747

... several provisions of the Tort Claims Act. See, e.g. , N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 (excusing public entity from liability for acts of its employees ...

docket:	a2706-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-12-20
status:	published
citation:	423 N.J.Super. 440 33 A.3d 519
Document Size:	34582

8 IN THE MATTER OF DANIEL RODRIGUEZ -- rank: 747

... several provisions of the Tort Claims Act. See, e.g. , N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 (excusing public entity from liability for acts of its employees ...

docket:	a2616-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-12-20
status:	published
citation:	423 N.J. Super. 440 33 A.3d 519
Document Size:	34587

9 JANE DOE v. RICHARD BURKE -- rank: 734

... should be dismissed because this claim alleges intentional conduct. See N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 (providing a public entity is not liable for 'acts or ... Four and Seven because the claims allege intentional acts. See N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 (providing '[a] public entity is not liable for the acts ...

docket:	a4920-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-08-17
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	60018

10 DIANA STEVENS v. COUNTY OF HUDSON, and NUZHAT IQBAL, improperly pled as NUZHAT IGBAL - -- rank: 727

... acts or omissions of a public employee constituting . . . actual malice[.]' N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. '[A] public corporation, such as a city or other public ... constituting a crime, actual fraud, actual malice, or willful misconduct.' N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. '[T]he existing law and public policy [is] that a ...

docket:	a5647-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-01-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41044

11 SOPHARIE LEANG et al. v. JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, -- rank: 716

... no liability for the willful misconduct of its employees "because N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 immunizes public entities from suits based upon the willful acts ... Board for any of these intentional torts by virtue of N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. Seal Tite Corp. v. Bressi , 312 N.J. Super. 532 ...

docket:	a5777-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-04-02
status:	published
citation:	399 N.J.Super. 329
Document Size:	176360

12 MICHAEL BESSASPARIS v. THE TOWNSHIP OF BRIDGEWATER -- rank: 686

... set forth in the First and Second Counts.' 4 Citing N.J.S.A. 59:2-10, the court stated '[r]espondeat superior applies to claims that ...

docket:	a1040-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-05-06
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41772

13 ANGELA HOAG v. COMMISSIONER DEVON BROWN, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. -- rank: 678

... constituting a crime, actual fraud, actual malice, or willful misconduct." N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. Thus, there can be no vicarious liability by a public ... A. Margolis & Robert Novack, Claims Against Public Entities , comment on N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 (Gann 2007) ("Clearly this section does not prevent allocation of ...

docket:	a5537-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-11-27
status:	published
citation:	397 N.J.Super. 34
Document Size:	102355

14 BOROUGH OF SEASIDE PARK v. JESSE SADEJ -- rank: 678

... its employees' acts that constitute fraud, malice, or willful misconduct. N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. A municipality "cannot entertain malice" as a public corporation. O ...

docket:	a6596-06
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-07-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	114543

15 WILLIAM TAGLIERI, et al. v. ALBERT MOSS, M.D. -- rank: 653

... standard of care owed to his patient, Warnebold. Footnote: 13 N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 protects a public entity from vicarious liability under the same ...

docket:	a5052-02
court:	njappellate
decided:	2004-02-26
status:	published
citation:	367 N.J. Super. 184
Document Size:	52120