Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 John Seals and Julia Seals v. County of Morris -- rank: 1000

... enact an ordinance regulating the location of the pole, see N.J.S.A. 59:2-4. Ibid. The majority then turned to the County ’ s ... is immune for its failure to enact an ordinance, see N.J.S.A . 59:2-4, does not mean that a utility is free from the ...

docket:	a-84-10
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2012-05-14
status:
citation:
Document Size:	675075

2 ELISSA ROSE MAYBLOOM v. JACKSON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 961

... had adequately demonstrated a dangerous condition on public property under N.J.S.A. 59:2-4. The motion judge concluded: There are situations where general standards ...

docket:	a5906-09
court:	superior court trial
decided:	2011-03-03
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	39324

3 Estate of Hiram A. Gonzalez v. City of Jersey City -- rank: 937

... the TCA cited by defendants in asserting immunity from liability -- N.J.S.A. 59:2-4 and :3-5 (failure to enforce a law), :3-3 ... 59:2-3(a), immunity for discretionary activities (public entity); N.J.S.A. 59:2-4, immunity for adoption or failure to adopt or enforce a ... the TCA cited by defendants in asserting immunity from liability -- N.J.S.A. 59:2-4, :3-3, :3-5, :5-4, and :5-5. 31 ... that neither the immunity for failure to enforce a law, N.J.S.A. 59:2-4 and :3-5, nor the immunity for good-faith enforcement ...

docket:	a-19-20
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2021-08-04
status:
citation:
Document Size:	71789

4 RUTH DEANE v. WINDING RIVER PARK ICE SKATING RINK -- rank: 937

... trial judge found that defendant had immunity under the TCA. N.J.S.A. 59:2-4. In addition, he found that plaintiff had not shown she ...

docket:	a5443-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-11-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31131

5 ERICA TURNER v. TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON -- rank: 863

... immunities provided by N.J.S.A. 59:5-5, N.J.S.A. 59:2-4 and N.J.S.A. 59:3-5 to be ... A. 59:2-3(d) (immunity for discretionary activities); or N.J.S.A. 59:2-4 or N.J.S.A. 59:3-5 (immunity for ...

docket:	a5478-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-23
status:	published
citation:	430 N.J.Super. 274 63 A.3d 1233
Document Size:	39752

6 S.P v. NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT -- rank: 863

... City of Newark , 125 N.J. 361 , 366 (1991) (citing N.J.S.A. 59:2-4 and N.J.S.A. 59:3-5). Moreover "considerations ... based on the officers' failure to enforce a law. See N.J.S.A. 59:2-4, N.J.S.A. 59:3-5. The immunity provided ...

docket:	a5591-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-09-27
status:	published
citation:	428 N.J.Super. 210 52 A.3d 178
Document Size:	68777

7 JANE DOE v. RICHARD BURKE -- rank: 846

... by failing to enforce any law.'' Id. at 301 (citing N.J.S.A. 59:2-4 (public entity)); see N.J.S.A. 59:3-5 ...

docket:	a4920-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-08-17
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	60018

8 CORRIE A. ALLEN v. PATRICK B. FLYNN -- rank: 830

... an injury caused by his . . . failure to enforce any law." N.J.S.A. 59:2-4 confers the same immunity on a public entity. Waterview argues ...

docket:	a6254-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39725

9 DANIEL MATTOS, v. PVT. PETER S. HOTALEN -- rank: 825

... the Law Division, arguing it was immune from liability under N.J.S.A. 59:2-4 of the TCA, which provides: 'A public entity is not ... of law in failing to dismiss plaintiffs' claims pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:2-4. Alternatively, the DOT argues that even if N.J.S ... against the DOT as a matter of law pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:2-4. Our legal analysis is guided by the following salient facts ... adopt a law or by failing to enforce any law.' N.J.S.A. 59:2-4 (emphasis added). Our Supreme Court's decision in Lee v ... law.' (Emphasis added). Here, the DOT seeks the immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:2-4, which provides: '[a] public entity is not liable for any ... 4554-16T3 here, entitling the DOT to absolute immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:2- 4. We thus reverse the order of the Law Division ...

docket:	a4554-16
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-08-22
status:
citation:
Document Size:	25966

10 L.E. v. THE PLAINFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOL -- rank: 814

... his [or her] failure to enforce any law .' See also N.J.S.A. 59:2-4 (extending similar immunity to public entities). The 1 Based on ... immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:3-5 and N.J.S.A. 59:2-4 addresses 'the government's failure to act or non-action ...

docket:	a3638-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-10-05
status:	Published
citation:	456 N.J.Super. 336 194 A.3d 105
Document Size:	38909

11 MARC J. MIGNANO v. JIM SULLIVAN, INC. -- rank: 808

... for the failure to adopt or enforce a law. See N.J.S.A. 59:2-4. The Township and its employees also have common law immunity ... A. 59:1-2; any failure to enforce the law, N.J.S.A. 59:2-4 and 59:3-5; any failure to inspect or negligent ...

docket:	a2995-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	125617

12 WILSON X. BEZERRA v. FRANK DELORENZO -- rank: 803

... the enforcement of laws provide absolute immunity to the Township. N.J.S.A. 59:2-4; 59:2-5. We do not agree, however, that the ...

docket:	a1149-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-08-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	75860

13 C.M.D. v. BRIDGEWAY REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. -- rank: 789

... the law (including, specifically, the child protective services laws), under N.J.S.A. 59:2-4 and N.J.S.A. 59:3-5; absolute immunity ... entities and public employees. First, with respect to public entities, N.J.S.A. 59:2-4 provides: 'A public entity is not liable for any injury ...

docket:	a2970-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-08-11
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	51385

14 MORTON SCHNEIDER et al. v. TOWNSHIP OF DOVER -- rank: 778

... follow its own regulation or state law, the court, citing N.J.S.A. 59:2-4, stated the municipality was immune from liability arising out of ...

docket:	a4312-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-08-10
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	65405

15 ANTHONY LEMMA v. PENNWOOD RACING -- rank: 773

... the State was entitled to immunity under the TCA, specifically N.J.S.A. 59:2-4. After Pennwood filed its answer, the court entered a case ... the State was entitled to immunity under the TCA, specifically N.J.S.A. 59:2-4, which provides that "[a] public entity is not liable for ... a law or by failing to enforce any law." Under N.J.S.A. 59:2-4, a public entity has absolute immunity from liability where the ... We are satisfied that the State is absolutely immune under N.J.S.A. 59:2-4 from liability on such claims, which are based on allegations ... determined that the State was entitled to absolute immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:2-4. Plaintiffs argue, however, that the trial court erred by granting ... in the complaint, the State was entitled to immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:2-4. Moreover, even if we accept the State's characterization ...

docket:	a5078-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33041