Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Angela Norris and George Norris v. Borough of Leonia -- rank: 1000

... curb, and statutory immunity under the TCA, specifically relying on N.J.S.A. 59:2-6, providing immunity for failure to make an inspection or make ... to determine whether other provisions of the TCA, e.g. , N.J.S.A. 59:2-6 or See footnote 4 4 IV     For the foregoing reasons ...

docket:	a-30-98
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1999-07-26
status:
citation:	160 N.J. 427
Document Size:	85372

2 John Seals and Julia Seals v. County of Morris -- rank: 984

... A. 59:4-2, or for failure to inspect, see N.J.S.A. 59:2-6, or for failure to enact an ordinance regulating the location ...

docket:	a-84-10
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2012-05-14
status:
citation:
Document Size:	675075

3 CATHERINE SCHMIDT v. CITY OF BAYONNE -- rank: 890

... Claims Act (TCA) for failing to inspect property pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:2-6 and in exercising its discretion in determining how to utilize ... N.J.S.A. 59:4-2, inspection immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:2-6 is inapplicable, and the court erred in granting summary judgment ... N.J. 608 (1998). The trial court's conclusion that N.J.S.A. 59:2-6 immunized the City for its employees' negligent inspection of roadways ... Educ. , 155 N.J. Super. 42 (Law Div. 1977). Moreover, N.J.S.A. 59:2-6 expressly provides: "[N]or shall this section exonerate a public ... act provides the controlling principles of liability." Legislative Comment on N.J.S.A. 59:2-6. We are also satisfied that the discretionary immunity defense of ... plaintiff fell, was palpably unreasonable. In summary, inspection immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:2-6 is inapplicable, and summary judgment should not have been ...

docket:	A0467-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-05-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	65444

4 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1560-19.opn.html -- rank: 811

... grass there' and concluded the failure-to-inspect immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:2-6 applied.2 Limiting its consideration of a dangerous condition to ... judge's finding regarding the failure-to- inspect immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:2-6. The judge's finding was conditional; it was premised on ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	23165

5 DIANE TIDER v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY -- rank: 789

... of failure to inspect are barred by the immunity in N.J.S.A. 59:2-6. Likewise, the judge found persuasive that the City was protected ... summary judgment on the issue of negligent inspection pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. ] 59:2-6, as no immunity attaches when a dangerous condition exists on ...

docket:	a3611-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44513

6 MARC J. MIGNANO v. JIM SULLIVAN, INC. -- rank: 783

... 59:3-5; any failure to inspect or negligent inspection, N.J.S.A. 59:2-6; and for discretionary activities, N.J.S.A. 59:2 ...

docket:	a2995-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	125617

7 JOHN SEALS v. COUNTY OF MORRIS -- rank: 774

... ordinance regulating the placement of utility poles under Chapter Two. N.J.S.A. 59:2-6 and 2-4. Therefore, we need not revisit the applicability ...

docket:	a5433-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-11-24
status:	published
citation:	417 N.J.Super. 74 8 A.3d 796
Document Size:	84750

8 JUSTINA CHOBOR v. TOWNSHIP OF PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLS -- rank: 752

... The court held that plaintiffs' negligence claim is barred by N.J.S.A. 59:2-6, which provides immunity to the Township for negligent inspections. In ... conclusion that plaintiffs' negligence claim is barred by the TCA. N.J.S.A. 59:2-6 provides that a public entity is not liable for injury ... 2013. These claims fall squarely within the immunity established by N.J.S.A. 59:2-6. In addition, the trial court correctly entered summary judgment on ...

docket:	a4148-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-11-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23972

9 KRYSTAL DUTCHER v. PHILLIPSBURG HOUSING AUTHORITY -- rank: 752

... for summary judgment, that defendant is immune from liability under N.J.S.A. 59:2-6. For reasons expressed hereinafter, we reverse on the appeal and ... be liable for a "negligent inspection" of its property under N.J.S.A. 59:2-6. 1 The judge granted defendant's motion, finding there was ... on its apparent alternative ground for summary judgment pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:2-6. Not only did the trial judge not decide the issue ... are unsure precisely what issue was raised by defendant under N.J.S.A. 59:2-6. This archive is a service of Rutgers School of Law ...

docket:	a0639-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21302

10 Hazel Hamrick Lee v. Florence Brown, et al. -- rank: 727

... a failure to inspect, or a negligent or inadequate inspection. N.J.S.A. 59:2-6, 59:3-7. (pp. 18-20) 2. A “failure ... a failure to inspect, or a negligent or inadequate inspection. N.J.S.A. 59:2-6, 59:3-7. In Bombace, we determined that a â ...

docket:	a_7_8_16
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2018-02-21
status:
citation:
Document Size:	45203

11 EDWARD TEMPESTA, et al. v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, et al. -- rank: 623

... J.S.A. 59:2-5, issuing an authorization; and N.J.S.A. 59:2-6, failing to inspect or negligent inspection. Defendant had previously asserted ...

docket:	A3811-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-08-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	61933

12 Estate of Alvin J. Townsend, Jr. v. NOAH PIERRE -- rank: 567

... any alleged failure to enforce maintenance or traffic codes, and N.J.S.A. 59:2-6 immunizes the Township from any alleged failure to inspect. Moreover ...

docket:	a4039-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-25
status:	published
citation:	429 N.J.Super. 522 60 A.3d 800
Document Size:	32052

13 DORIS BYRD AND HAYDEN BYRD h/w v. SALEM COMMUNITY COLLEGE -- rank: 507

... Plaintiff claims this was a violation of the TCA, specifically N.J.S.A. 59:2-6, which provides that a public entity may be liable for ...

docket:	a0759-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-07-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53118

14 FRANK OZELLO, JR. v. JASON CYRUS -- rank: 495

... are immune from liability for negligent inspections under the TCA. N.J.S.A. 59:2-6 provides: A public entity is not liable for injury caused ...

docket:	a5264-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-01-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25947