Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Fluehr v. City of Cape May -- rank: 1000

... trumped the imposition of liability for negligent supervision provided under N.J.S.A. 59:3-11. Id. at 484.     The Appellate Division reversed. Id. at 481 ... for negligence in the supervision of a public recreational facility." N.J.S.A. 59:3-11. Although both of those statutes are relevant to issues of ... and liability involves governmental responsibility for public property in general. N.J.S.A. 59:3-11 provides:         A public employee is not liable for the failure ... The liability that “otherwise exists” in New Jersey is under N.J.S.A. 59:3-11, which expressly declines to exonerate "a public employee for negligence ... should be liable for their negligent supervision of recreational facilities. N.J.S.A. 59:3-11. The State of Hawaii (whose beaches rival New Jersey's ...

docket:	a-136-97
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1999-05-26
status:
citation:	159 N.J. 532
Document Size:	98800

2 MICHAEL AVERSANO, et al. v. PALISADES INTERSTATE PARKWAY COMMISSION, et al. -- rank: 916

... negligence of a public employee who is not immune. See N.J.S.A. 59:3-11. Justice Handler noted two sections of the Tort Claims Act ... to supervise a recreational facility and liability for negligent supervision. N.J.S.A. 59:3-11 (as to the public employee) and N.J.S.A ... to save drowning ocean bathers." Id . at 562. See also N.J.S.A. 59:3-11. Likewise, the very essence of the Parkway Police's duty ...

docket:	A3947-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-10-01
status:	published
citation:	363 N.J. Super. 266 832 A.2d 914
Document Size:	75333

3 SUZANNE PAGONIS v. BOROUGH OF ALLENDALE -- rank: 883

... west beach or their access to the west beach. See N.J.S.A. 59:3-11 ('A public employee is not liable for the failure to ... 4071-18 13 (granting summary judgment to municipality pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:3-11 and rejecting claim that periodic warnings from lifeguards on an ... pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:4-2 and N.J.S.A. 59:3-11, we need not consider whether the immunities provided by N ...

docket:	a4071-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-03-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29983

4 WILLIAM FLEUHR V. CITY OF CAPE MAY ET AL -- rank: 839

... affect this case: N.J.S.A. 59:2-7, N.J.S.A. 59:3-11 and N.J.S.A. 59:4-8. N.J ... failure to protect against a dangerous condition as provided in [ N.J.S.A. 59:3-11 is the public employee counterpart to N.J.S.A ... negligence once he undertakes to supervise the facility." Comment on N.J.S.A. 59:3-11.     By contrast, N.J.S.A. 59:4-8 provides ... we observed that plaintiff's claim was also barred by N.J.S.A. 59:3-11 because plaintiff's claim rested on the municipality's failure ... make natural conditions of unimproved land safe. The provisions of N.J.S.A. 59:3-11 do not jeopardize that legislative concern because they provide that ...

docket:	a0846-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-07-30
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	24923

5 THERESA LEE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 627

... in Chapter 4 [of Title 59]. Moreover, a companion provision, N.J.S.A. 59:3-11, immunizes public employees from liability for "failure to provide supervision ...

docket:	a1077-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-06-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	65270