Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 9:17-42")   1 to 5 of 5 results. Run time: 0.740 seconds | Search time: 0.733 seconds    
1 R.A.C. v. P.J.S., Jr., et al. -- rank: 1000
... 7       Footnote: 1 To comply with the confidentiality requirements of N.J.S.A. 9:17-42, initials were used by the lower courts to identify the ...
docket: a-5-06
court: njsupreme
decided: 2007-07-17
status:
citation: 192 N.J. 81
Document Size: 73687
2 In the Matter of the Trust Created by Agreement Dated December 20, 1961 by and between John Seward Johnson, Grantor, and Philip B. Hofmann, Gustav O. Lienhard, and Kenneth Perry, Trustees -- rank: 865
... methods by which the parent-child relationship may be proved, N.J.S.A. 9:17-42, establishing the jurisdiction of the Superior Court and providing for ...
docket: a-69-99
court: njsupreme
decided: 2001-02-15
status:
citation: 166 N.J. 340
Document Size: 65442
3 A. v. B. v. Hill Wallack -- rank: 659
... the identity, of the husband's child does not violate N.J.S.A. 9:17-42, the confidentiality provision of the New Jersey Parentage Act. (p ... but not the identity, of the child will not contravene N.J.S.A. 9:17-42, which provides:         All papers and records and any information pertaining ...
docket: a-86-98
court: njsupreme
decided: 1999-04-15
status:
citation: 158 N.J. 51
Document Size: 53251
4 M.B. v. J.H. -- rank: 659
... to the post-judgment motion and appeal be impounded. See N.J.S.A. 9:17-42 (stating that records pertaining to actions under the Uniform Parentage ...
docket: a3289-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-11-20
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 30731
5 L.C. v. S.C. -- rank: 582
... the Family Part trial record is under seal pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:17- 42 and Rule 5:3-2, we use initials in place ... S. have violated related orders sealing the record, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:17-42 and Rule 5:3-2. L.C. v. S.C ...
docket: a0682-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-01-22
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 7548

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!