Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. R.W. and M.M and L.S. and J.S -- rank: 1000

... that does not end our inquiry. As Mark points out, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(a) provides, in part: Notwithstanding any provision of law to ... a stay in accordance with the Rules of Court. Although N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(a) allows a Family Part judge to award custody or ... the record demonstrates he never applied for a hearing under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(a). Further, he did not provide an evaluation to support ... the judge should relieve him from his parole restrictions under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(a), and because the judge credited Dr. Jeffrey's assessment ...

docket:	a3037-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-03-03
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	114419

2 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. R.A.B. -- rank: 896

... proved it was in Lauren's best interest, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(a). The Division placed Lauren in one of its resource ... v. H.R. , 431 N.J. Super. 212, 226 (2013). N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(a) nevertheless states: Notwithstanding any provision of law to the ... when he failed to obtain custody of them pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(a) . We disagree. Roger first asserts his case is readily ... the child for custody or visitation rights to be awarded." N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(a). Moreover, the trial record is devoid of any evidence ... attorney never asked the court for a hearing, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(a) . Roger states his first attorney failed to obtain the ... took over. Roger argues his second attorney did not understand N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(a) because she said, "[A]s far as parole ...

docket:	a3838-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-06-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	62844

3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PIETRO J. PARISI, JR -- rank: 860

... the removal of the child from defendant's custody. When N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1 was first enacted in 1995, see L. 1995, c. 55 ... assault, unless it was in the child's best interest. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1 was amended in 2000, see L. 1999, c. 424 (effective ... Accordingly, when defendant pled guilty to child endangerment in 1996, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1 did not affect his custody or visitation rights. Since neither ... A. 2C:14-2, the custody and visitation restrictions in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1 already applied to him because of his 1996 conviction. It ... his plea in 2003 because whatever the ultimate consequences of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1, they were produced by the original plea in 1996. With ... 3 In our view, defendant has overstated the consequences of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1. Contrary to his argument, the statute does not terminate ...

docket:	a4901-09
court:	appellate
decided:	2013-03-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25673

4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. B.B. -- rank: 821

... and visitation, not on termination of parental rights. In that N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(b) provides that a person convicted of endangering a child ...

docket:	a0498-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-05-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53345

5 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0016-20.opn.html -- rank: 807

... of a minor, plaintiff asserted the Fathered by Rape statute, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1, applied and the record lacked clear and convincing evidence defendant ... his incarceration. A-0016-20 9 reconsideration, the judge ruled N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1 was 'not applicable at this juncture.' The judge also denied plaintiff's request for a stay under N.J.S.A. 9:2- 4.1. On appeal, plaintiff argues the judge erred in failing to consider defendant's guilty plea as a conviction under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1. She also claims the judge erred in denying her attorney ... the judge erred in deeming the Fathered by Rape statute, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1, was inapplicable and awarding defendant parenting time with Mary pending his incarceration. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1 provides: Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	26460

6 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.L. -- rank: 798

... failed to satisfy the statutory test, and that "pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1, there is clear and convincing evidence that awarding custody of ... met, and that Michael did not establish, as required by N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(b), 3 by clear and convincing evidence that he should ... found that termination would not do more harm than good. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(b) applies because Michael was convicted of endangering the welfare ... that Michael failed to meet his burden of proof under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(b). I. An appellate court's review of a trial ... that termination would not do more harm than good. Finally, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(b) states that there must be clear and convincing evidence ... child who was injured is a different child. See ibid. ( N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(b) applies to the parent's custody of or ...

docket:	a1683-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-03-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28724

7 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2509-13xx.opn.html -- rank: 756

... evidence that it is in the best interests of Sandra. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1. The judge also noted that Rich "abandoned these children by ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	53769

8 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. R.V.R. -- rank: 756

... evidence that it is in the best interests of Sandra. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1. The judge also noted that Rich "abandoned these children by ...

docket:	a2508-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-12-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	54856

9 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. R.V.R. -- rank: 756

... evidence that it is in the best interests of Sandra. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1. The judge also noted that Rich "abandoned these children by ...

docket:	a2507-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-12-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	54856

10 BRYAN ALINTOFF v. RACHEL B ALINTOFF -- rank: 715

... Judge Grasso Jones considered each of the statutory factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. [1] the parents' ability to agree, communicate and cooperate in matters ...

docket:	a0785-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-05-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	54189

11 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. H.V., SR -- rank: 703

... child endangering conviction, Henry was prohibited from visitation pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1. This archive is a service of Rutgers School of Law ...

docket:	a4736-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32811

12 NEW JERSEY DIVIISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. E.G. -- rank: 697

... approximately two months. Third, there is the significant hurdle of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(b), which prohibits a person convicted of endangering the welfare ...

docket:	a3236-13
court:	superior court trial
decided:	2015-02-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27724

13 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. E.G. & A.R. -- rank: 697

... approximately two months. Third, there is the significant hurdle of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(b), which prohibits a person convicted of endangering the welfare ...

docket:	a3235-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-02-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27848

14 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. M.F. -- rank: 667

... in a hearing in which she sought visitation pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1, and that her counsel provided ineffective assistance. The Division and ... the Law Guardian's motion to suspend visitation pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1. 4 M.F. did not move to reinstate visitation until ...

docket:	a0786-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37519

15 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. T.A.C. -- rank: 655

... reflected in an order, after the judge ruled, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2- 4.1(a), defendant – in light of his conviction for sexual ...

docket:	a4390-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-03-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36194