Centenial Celebration

Transaction Search Form: please type in any of the fields below.

Date: November 25, 2024 Mon

Time: 8:12 pm

Results for indeterminate sentences

3 results found

Author: Great Britain. Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Probation

Title: Indeterminate Sentences for Public Protection: A Joint Inspection by HMI Probation and HMI Prisons

Summary: The wide scope of sentences of Imprisonment for Public Protection (UK) has resulted in a large number of prisoners that neither the probation service nor the prisons system can handle effectively. This report focuses on probation's role in managing these offenders, both in custody and after release, and expresses doubts about probation's capacity to work effectively with each case when the number of cases coming through the system is so great.

Details: London: HMI Probation and HMI Prisons, 2010. 45p.

Source: Criminal Justice Joint Inspection

Year: 2010

Country: United Kingdom

URL:

Shelf Number: 117832

Keywords:
Indeterminate Sentences
Probation (United Kingdom)

Author: Slobogin, Christopher

Title: Prevention as the Primary Goal of Sentencing: The Modern Case for Indeterminate Dispositions in Criminal Cases

Summary: Among modern-day legal academics determinate sentencing and limiting retributivism tend to be preferred over indeterminate sentencing, at least in part because the latter option is viewed as immoral. This Article contends to the contrary that, properly constituted, indeterminate sentencing is both a morally defensible method of preventing crime and the optimal regime for doing so. More specifically, the position defended in this Article is that, once a person is convicted of such an offense, the duration and nature of sentence should be based on a back-end decision made by experts in recidivism reduction, within very broad ranges set by the legislature. The territory covered in this Article, particularly as it addresses the debate between deontological retributivists and utilitarians, is well-trodden. But this Article seeks to provide new perspectives on the morality, legality, and practicality of indeterminate sentencing. It starts with an outline of what a properly constituted indeterminate sentencing regime would look like. It then defends this regime against numerous objections.

Details: Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Law School, 2011. 47p.

Source: Internet Resource: Vanderbilt University Law School,
Public Law & Legal Theory
Working Paper Number 11-31
Law & Economics Working Paper Number 11-43: Accessed November 16, 2011 at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1959489

Year: 2011

Country: United States

URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1959489

Shelf Number: 123368

Keywords:
Indeterminate Sentences
Punishment
Risk Assessment
Sentencing (U.S.)

Author: Howard League for Penal Reform

Title: The Never-Ending Story: Indeterminate Sentencing and the Prison Regime. Research Briefing

Summary: The Imprisonment for Public Protection sentence (IPP) was poorly planned and implemented and resulted in unjust punishments, particularly for those sentenced prior to 2008. Despite the abolition of the sentence in 2012, serious implications for the prison estate remain - There are currently 5,809 people in prison serving an IPP; over half (3,570) have passed their tariff date - Urgent action needs to be taken to enable the safe release of people serving post-tariff IPPs into the community - The analysis is based on information provided by 103 senior prison governors, whose responses drew almost exclusively on their experience of working with IPP prisoners. The majority reported that IPP sentences had a negative impact on prisoners, prison staff, and the prison regime - The findings suggest that there are insufficient resources to deliver IPPs effectively. Resource shortages often lead to resentment between IPP prisoners and other prisoners and may threaten the safety and stability of the prison regime - Ninety-two per cent reported that IPPs decreased staff job satisfaction as they undermined staff credibility, prevented staff treating all prisoners fairly, and often meant staff were unable to assist prisoners in progressing through their sentences - The majority recommended that the government enable post-tariff IPP prisoners to be safely managed into the community. To achieve this, respondents said it was necessary to increase resources, enhance the role of probation, alter the release process for IPP prisoners and convert IPP sentences with short minimum terms to determinate sentences.

Details: London: Howard League for Penal Reform, 2014. 6p.

Source: Internet Resource: Accessed May 14, 2014 at: https://d19ylpo4aovc7m.cloudfront.net/fileadmin/howard_league/user/online_publications/never-ending_story_IPP.pdf

Year: 2013

Country: United Kingdom

URL: https://d19ylpo4aovc7m.cloudfront.net/fileadmin/howard_league/user/online_publications/never-ending_story_IPP.pdf

Shelf Number: 104822

Keywords:
Imprisonment for Public Protection
Indeterminate Sentences
Punishment
Sentencing (U.K.)