Centenial Celebration

Transaction Search Form: please type in any of the fields below.

Date: November 25, 2024 Mon

Time: 8:04 pm

Results for morality

2 results found

Author: Falk, Armin

Title: Status Inequality, Moral Disengagement and Violence

Summary: This paper studies the causal effect of status differences on moral disengagement and violence. To measure violent behavior, in the experiment, a subject can inflict a painful electric shock on another subject in return for money. We exogenously vary relative status in the realm of sexual attractiveness. In three between-subject conditions, the assigned other subject is either of higher, lower or equal status. The incidence of electric shocks is substantially higher among subjects matched with higher- and lower-status others, relative to subjects matched with equal-status others. This causal evidence on the role of status inequality on violence suggests an important societal cost of economic and social inequalities

Details: Bonn, Germany: IZA - Institute of Labor Economics, 2017. 31p.

Source: Internet Resource: IZA DP No. 10921: Accessed September 7, 2017 at: http://ftp.iza.org/dp10921.pdf

Year: 2017

Country: Germany

URL: http://ftp.iza.org/dp10921.pdf

Shelf Number: 147143

Keywords:
Inequality
Morality
Socioeconomic Status and Crime
Violent Crime

Author: Alden, Andrea Lisa

Title: (Dis)articulating Morality and Myth: An Ideological History of the Insanity Defense

Summary: Both law and medicine are interpretive practices, and both systems have historically worked in tandem, however ineffectively or tumultuously. The law is, by social mandate, imagined as a "fixed" system of social control, made up of rules and procedures grounded in a reality that is independent of language; although we know that law is both revised and interpreted every day in courtroom practice, to imagine the law, the system that keeps bad people behind bars and good people safe, as indeterminate or, worse, fallible, produces social anxieties that upend our cultural assumptions about fairness that predate our judicial system. This imaginary stability, then, is ultimately what prevents the legal system from evolving in consonance with developments in the mental health professions, as inadequate as that discursive system may be for describing and categorizing the infinite possibilities of mental illness, specifically where it is relevant to the commission of a crime. Ultimately, the insanity plea raises the specter of the endless interpretability of the law and mental illness and, therefore, the frailty of the justice system, which makes each insanity defense trial emblematic of larger social anxieties about social control, fairness, and susceptibility to mental illness or the actions of mentally ill people.

Details: Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, 2014. 103p.

Source: Internet Resource: Dissertation: Accessed October 22, 2018 at: https://repository.asu.edu/attachments/135097/content/Alden_asu_0010E_13952.pdf

Year: 2014

Country: United States

URL: https://repository.asu.edu/attachments/135097/content/Alden_asu_0010E_13952.pdf

Shelf Number: 153034

Keywords:
Insanity Defense
Mental Illness
Mentally Ill Persons
Morality