Transaction Search Form: please type in any of the fields below.
Date: April 18, 2024 Thu
Time: 3:52 am
Time: 3:52 am
Results for contrabanc
1 results foundAuthor: Kleiman, Mark A.R. Title: Countervailing Effects: What the FDA Would Have to Know to Evaluate Tobacco Regulations Summary: The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act [P.L. 111-31] gives the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the authority to regulate tobacco products, including placing restrictions on product composition, sale, and distribution. A complete accounting of the costs and benefits of any tobacco regulation includes harms from possible illicit trade in tobacco products (ITTP): costs of enforcement, violence, incarceration, etc. Indeed, the law instructs the FDA to take into account the "countervailing effects" of regulation on public health, "such as the creation of a significant demand for contraband or other tobacco products that do not meet the requirements." While the law's narrow focus on public health may limit the scope of an inquiry by the FDA compared to a full benefit-cost analysis, aspects of ITTP such as violence and incarceration have substantial health impacts. Illicit markets in drugs such as cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine, not to mention the grand experiment of alcohol Prohibition in the early 20th century, illustrate the substantial risks of unwanted side effects of drug prohibition. But taxes, product limitations, access restrictions, and narrowly defined product bans constitute "lesser prohibitions," and are subject to the same kind (if not degree) of risks. All tobacco policy-making should therefore consider ITTP. This article sets forth a research agenda for the FDA to consider in order to estimate the effects of contemplated tobacco-product regulation and ITTP. We argue that, to carry out fully its legislative mandate, the FDA would have to determine the current size and impact of ITTP, analyze how these may be expected to change under new regulations, and look for inter-dependencies among tobacco-product markets that may complicate single-product regulation. A more challenging element of the research agenda would be to develop a better theoretical groundwork for the prediction of the emergence, size, and side effects of illicit markets. Details: Malibu, CA: Pepperdine University, 2015. 60p. Source: Internet Resource: accessed August 16, 2018 at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=sppworkingpapers Year: 2015 Country: United States URL: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=sppworkingpapers Shelf Number: 151148 Keywords: Cigarettes ContrabancCounterfeit Products Counterfeit Tobacco Illicit Markets Smuggling Tax Evasion Tobacco |