IMPERATO v. CONCORD CASUALTY AND SURETY CO., 112 N.J.L. 503 (1934)
171 A. 795
PASQUALE IMPERATO, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM, ETC., RESPONDENT, v.CONCORD CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANT.Court of Errors and Appeals.Argued February 8, 1934 —
Decided April 12, 1934.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 12 N.J. Mis. R. 27.
For the respondent, Kalisch Kalisch.
For the appellant, Frank G. Turner.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.Page 504