FRYLING v. RUSS, 113 N.J.L. 160 (1934)
172 A. 729
E. LEONARD FRYLING AND HARRY F. FRYLING, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HOWARDRUSS AND WARREN K. RUSS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.Court of Errors and Appeals.Argued May 22, 1934 —
Decided May 24, 1934.
For the defendants-appellants, Howard Eastwood.
For the plaintiffs-respondents, French, Richards Bradley
(Floyd H. Bradley).
PER CURIAM.
From an examination of the record in this case it is apparent that there were fact questions presented which were submittedPage 161
by the trial judge to the jury in a charge that was faultless so far as any question is presented for our determination.
The judgment is affirmed.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, DEAR, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.