IN RE RYNO, 06-5336 (D.C. Cir. 7-13-2007)
In re: R. D. Ryno, Jr., et al., Petitioners.
No. 06-5336.United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: July 13, 2007.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] BEFORE: Ginsburg, Chief Judge, and Henderson and Tatel, Circuit Judges
ORDER
Per Curiam
Upon consideration of the motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioners Seward, Pallone, Haden, and Webb; and the petition for a writ of mandamus, it is
ORDERED that motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be granted. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus be denied as to petitioners Seward, Pallone, Haden, and Webb. Because the district court has taken action, petitioners have failed to show a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See GulfstreamAerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 289
(1988). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus be dismissed as moot as to petitioner Ryno, whose motion for voluntary dismissal was granted by the district court by minute order entered February 7, 2007.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.Page 1