ADAMS v. RICE, 07-5101 (D.C. Cir. 7-13-2007)
Kathy E. Adams, Appellant v. Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of State,Appellee.
No. 07-5101.United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
filed On: July 13, 2007.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] BEFORE: Sentelle, Henderson, and Tatel, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Per Curiam
Upon consideration of the motion for an extension of time to file a motion for summary affirmance and the opposition thereto; and the lodged motion for summary affirmance, it is
ORDERED that the motion for an extension of time to file a motion for summary affirmance be granted. Appellee has shown good cause for extending the time to file a dispositive motion. See D.C. Cir. rule 27(g). The Clerk is directed to file the lodged motion for summary affirmance. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that appellant file her response to the motion for summary affirmance within 14 days of the date of this order.Page 1