LONDON v. GREAT SOCIALIST, 07-7117 (D.C. Cir. 12-14-2007)
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, each severally subscribing toinsurance policies each for his own part and not one for the other numberedAE2141B and VS5057L, et al., Appellants v. Great Socialist People's LibyanArab Jamahiriya, et al., a/k/a Libya, Appellees.
No. 07-7117.United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: December 14, 2007.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] BEFORE: Rogers, Garland, and Griffith, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the motion to dismiss and the opposition thereto, it is.
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be granted. The district court has neither disposed of plaintiffs' claims against the Syrian defendants — against whom only defaults, and not default judgments, have been entered — nor certified its order for immediate appeal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). We therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc.See Fed.R.App.P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.Page 1