CARGILL POWER v. FEDERAL ENERGY, 255 Fed.Appx. 530 (D.C. Cir. 2007)
CARGILL POWER MARKETS, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. FEDERAL ENERGYREGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent Midwest Independent Transmission SystemOperator, Inc., et al., Intervenors.
No. 06-1084.United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
November 14, 2007.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
On Petition for Review of Orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Floyd Ligon Norton, IV, Joseph Charles Hall, Jason Brent Tompkins, Morgan, Lewis Bockius, LLP, Washington, DC, Shawn Patrick Leyden, Newark, NJ, for Petitioners.
Robert Harris Solomon, John Stewart Moot, Carol Jayne Banta, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Stephen L. Teichler, Duane Morris, LLP, Washington, DC, Stephen GerardPage 531
Kozey, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., Carmel, IN, for Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
Brian Michael Meloy, James J. Bertrand, Leonard, Street
Deinard, Minneapolis, MN, Split Rock Energy, LLC.
Douglas F. John, John Hengerer, Washington, DC, for American Transmission Company, LLC, International Transmission Company and Michigan Electric Transmission Company, LLC.
Michael Edwin Small, Amanda Marie Riggs, Wright Talisman, Washington, DC, for Midwest ISO Transmission Owners.
Before: HENDERSON and TATEL, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge.
JUDGMENT
This petition was considered on the record from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See
Fed.R.App.P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. R. 41.