U.S. v. MELO, 295 Fed.Appx. 955 (11th Cir. 2008)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mario MELO,Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-10959 Non-Argument Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
October 6, 2008.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Neal Gary Rosensweig, Hollywood, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney's Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.Page 956
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 04-20139-CR-JEM.
Before BIRCH, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Neal Gary Rosensweig, counsel for Mario Melo, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent review of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Melo's sentence following re-sentencing is AFFIRMED. WeDENY as moot Melo's motion to dismiss counsel on appeal, and we DENY Melo's motions to dismiss his appeal and/or hold his appeal in abeyance.