PENSION v. DURANGO, 251 Fed.Appx. 664 (11th Cir. 2007)
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION, an agency and corporation of theUnited States Government, 1200 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005-4026,Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DURANGO GEORGIA PAPER CO., as plan administratorof the Gilman Paper Company Pension Plan for Hourly Employees, 1000Osborne Street, St. Mary's, GA 31558, Defendant-Appellee, H.G. Estate,LLC, The Howard Gilman Foundation, Inc., W.O. Corporation,Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants.
No. 07-10558, Non-Argument Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
October 19, 2007.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
James A. Pardo, Jr., King Spalding, Atlanta, GA, for Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants.
Nathaniel Rayle, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Mark Shand Watson, Stone Baxter, Macon, GA, Kartar S. Khalsa, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia. D.C. Docket No. 05-00153-CV-2.
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
H.G. Estate, LLC, The Howard Gilman Foundation, Inc. and W.O. Corporation ("Intervenors") appeal the district court's judgment following an order granting the joint motion to dismiss of Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC") and Durango Georgia Paper Company ("Durango").
Intervenors raise two issues on appeal: (1) whether the district court erred in dismissing the litigation and (2) alternatively, whether the district court erred by not imposing conditions on the dismissal.Page 665
We review a court's grant of a motion to dismiss for abuse of discretion. Fisher v. Puerto Rico Marine Mgmt., Inc.,940 F.2d 1502, 1503 (11th Cir. 1991). Having considered the briefs and the record, we find no abuse of discretion in the dismissal. AFFIRMED.