U.S. v. ROCA-OLMOS, 243 Fed.Appx. 567 (11th Cir. 2007)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Abel ROCA-OLMOS,Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-11751 Non-Argument Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
September 20, 2007.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Abel Roca-Olmos, Lisbon, OH, pro se.
David Andrew Sigler, U.S. Attorney's Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. D.C. Docket No. 95-00132-CRWS.
Before DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for Abel Roca-Olmos, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record confirms counsel's assessment of the relative merits of the appeal.Page 568
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issue of arguable merit, counsel's motion to withdraw isGRANTED, and Roca's conviction and sentence areAFFIRMED.