U.S. v. FULTON, 257 Fed.Appx. 173 (11th Cir. 2007)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eddie L. FULTON,Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-10491, Non-Argument Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
November 30, 2007.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Nathan Dorian Clark, Coral Reef Law Offices, P.A., Miami, FL, for Defendants Appellant.
Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney's Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 03-20471-CR-ASG.
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Nathan Clark, appointed counsel for Eddie Fulton in this direct criminal and sentencing appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Fulton's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.