TESSERA v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMM'N, 388 Fed.Appx. 999 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
TESSERA, INC., Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee,and Elpida Memory, Inc. and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc., Intervenors, andSmart Modular Technologies, Inc., Intervenor, and Acer, Inc., AcerAmerica Corporation, Nanya Technology Corporation, Nanya TechnologyCorporation U.S.A., and Powerchip Semiconductor Corporation (now known asPowerchip Technology Corporation), Intervenors, and Ramaxel Technology,Ltd., Intervenor, and Kingston Technology Company, Inc., Intervenor.
No. 2010-1176.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
August 5, 2010.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
On appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-630.
Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
ON MOTION ORDER
Tessera, Inc. moves for leave to file a reply brief not to exceed 12,000 words. The intervenors oppose. Tessera replies.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT Is ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted in part; Tessera's reply brief, not to exceed 10,000 words, is due within 14 days of the date of filing of this order.