U.S. v. RIVERA-MENDOZA, 422 Fed.Appx. 389 (5th Cir. 2011)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ramiro RIVERA-MENDOZA,Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-40807 Conference Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 19, 2011.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., H. Michael Sokolow, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender's Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, USDC No. 2:10-CR-307-1.
Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:[fn*]
[fn*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramiro Rivera-Mendoza (Rivera) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), andUnited States v. Flares, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rivera has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rivera's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.Page 390