GOODEN v. QUARTERMAN, 249 Fed.Appx. 358 (5th Cir. 2007)
Eddie Lee GOODEN, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant v. Nathaniel QUARTERMAN,Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional InstitutionsDivision, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 06-11130 Summary Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
October 2, 2007.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Eddie Lee Gooden, Iowa Park, TX, pro se.
Marta Rew McLaughlin, Office of the Attorney General, Postconviction Litigation Div., Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, USDC No. 7:05-CV-221.
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:[fn*]
[fn*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Eddie Lee Gooden, Jr., Texas prisoner # 588165, appeals his preliminary-injunctionPage 359
motion's being denied because he failed to provide notice to the Respondent, as required by federal and local rules. Gooden's preliminary-injunction motion, related to the issues raised in his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in district court, is immediately appealable.28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1); Lakedreams v. Taylor, 932 F.2d 1103, 1107
(5th Cir. 1991). Nevertheless, because Gooden has failed to address the basis for the district court's denial, he has waived its review. E.g., Brinkmann v. Dallas County DeputySheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).
AFFIRMED.