U.S. v. COATES, 286 Fed.Appx. 189 (5th Cir. 2008)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael Lynn COATES,Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 08-10194 Conference Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
August 6, 2008.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Jeffrey Robert Haag, U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Helen Miller Liggett, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender's Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendants-Appellant.Page 190
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, USDC No. 6:03-CR-43-ALL.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:[fn*]
[fn*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Michael Lynn Coates raises arguments that are foreclosed by UnitedStates v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir. 2005), which held that a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial to determine whether the terms of supervised release have been violated. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.