JARVIS v. ASTRUE, 282 Fed.Appx. 259 (4th Cir. 2008)
Reginald E. JARVIS, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE,Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant — Appellee.
No. 07-1994.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: June 19, 2008.
Decided: June 23, 2008.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:05-cv-02950-CCB).
Phillip R. Kete, General Counsel, AFGE Local 1923, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Larry D. Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Reginald E. Jarvis appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's summary judgment motion on his race discrimination claim, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jarvis v. Astrue, No. 1:05-cv-02950-CCB, 2007 WL 2332694 (D.Md. July 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.