BLACKBURN v. SOUTH CAROLINA, 404 Fed.Appx. 810 (4th Cir. 2010)
Richard E. BLACKBURN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA;South Carolina Department of Corrections: Jon Ozmint, Director of SouthCarolina Department of Corrections; Robert Ward, Regional Director ofSouth Carolina Department of Corrections; Robin Chavis, ECI AssociateWarden; Ms. Sprattling, ECI Grievance Clerk; Sandra Bowie, Chief, BranchGrievance; J. Glenn Alewine; Pravin R. Patel, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-6677.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: November 30, 2010.
Decided: December 17, 2010.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (9:06-cv-02011-PMD).
Richard E. Blackburn, Appellant Pro Se. Bradford Cary Andrews, Samuel F. Arthur, III, Aiken, Bridges, Nunn, Elliott Tyler, PA, Florence, South Carolina; Benjamin Albert Baroody, Bellamy, Rutenburg, Copeland, Epps, Gravely Bowers, PA, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Richard E. Blackburn appeals the district court's order adopting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Blackburn's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blackburn v. SouthCarolina, No. 9:06-cv-02011-PMD, 2009 WL 632542
(D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.Page 811