HENDRICKS v. POWHATAN CORK. CENTER, 412 Fed.Appx. 572 (4th Cir. 2011)
Terry HENDRICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. POWHATAN CORK. CENTERWARDEN/SUPERINTENDENT, sued in their individual and official capacities;Mr. Graham, Counselor, sued in their individual and official capacities;V. Evans, L.T.; Sgt. R. Jackson; c/o Taliaferro; Sgt. Green; P. Gurney,Asst. Warden; Mr. Mahon, Warden, sued in their individual and officialcapacities, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-7522.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: February 10, 2011.
Decided: February 23, 2011.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00445-RBS-FBS).
Terry Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Terry Hendricks appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hendricks v. PowhatanCorr. Ctr., No. 2:10-cv-00445-RBS-FBS (E.D.Va. Oct. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.Page 573