BURDICK v. PRITCHETT BIRCH, 326 Fed.Appx. 169 (4th Cir. 2009)
George E. BURDICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRITCHETT BIRCH, PLLC;Lloyd C. Smith, Jr.; Regina Parker; Samuel Grimes; Christopher B. McLendon,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-1216.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: May 28, 2009.
Decided: June 5, 2009.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:08-cv-00053-BO).
George E. Burdick, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Graham Baker, Baker, Jenkins, Jones Daly, PA, Ahoskie, North Carolina, Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.Page 170
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
George E. Burdick appeals the district court's orders granting Defendants' motion to dismiss his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burdick v. Pritchett Birch, PLLC, No. 4:08-cv-00053-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2008; Jan. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.