U.S. v. CHILDS, 367 Fed.Appx. 411 (4th Cir. 2010)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julian GrantCHILDS, a/k/a Poncho, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-7873.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: February 18, 2010.
Decided: February 25, 2010.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:05-cr-00249-RLW-1).
Julian Grant Childs, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Julian Grant Childs appeals the district court's order denying his pro se motion to compel the Government to file a motion for sentence reduction pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. SeeUnited States v. Childs, No. 3:05-cr-00249-RLW-l (E.D.Va. Sept. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.