HINTON v. WARDEN, 367 Fed.Appx. 459 (4th Cir. 2010)
Frank L. HINTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, UNITED STATESPENITENTIARY-HAZELTON, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 09-8159.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: February 18, 1010.
Decided: February 26, 2010.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:09-cv-00096-REM-JES).
Frank L. Hinton, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., Rita R. Valdrini, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Frank L. Hinton, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court and the magistrate judge.Hinton v. Warden, USP Hazelton, No. 2:09-cv-00096-REM-JES, 2009 WL 3762306 (N.D.W.Va., Nov. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.Page 460