THAM v. H. HOLDER, 377 Fed.Appx. 288 (4th Cir. 2010)
Etty THAM, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,Respondent.
No. 09-1246.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: April 20, 2010.
Decided: May 5, 2010.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Wei Jia, Law Office of Wei Jia, Boston, Massachusetts, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Shelley R. Goad, Assistant Director, Julia J. Tyler, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Etty Tham, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on Tham's motion. See8 C.F.R. ยง 1003.2(a) (2009). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Tham
(B.I.A. Nov. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.