GRANT v. NT. CHARLESTON HSG. AUTH., 365 Fed.Appx. 460 (4th Cir. 2010)
Doris S. GRANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON HOUSINGAUTHORITY; Board of Commissioners of The Housing Authority of The City ofNorth Charleston, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-2194.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: February 3, 2010.
Decided: February 16, 2010.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (2:06-cv-03242-CWH).
Edward M. Brown, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Caroline Wrenn Cleveland, Cleveland Law, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.Page 461
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Doris S. Grant appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and granting the Appellees' summary judgment motion in Grant's employment discrimination case brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. ยงยง 2000e to2000e-17 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant v. City of North CharlestonHous. Auth., No. 2:06-cv-03242-CWH, 2008 WL 4372980
(D.S.C. Sept. 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.