VAUGHN v. ASTRUE, 412 Fed.Appx. 559 (4th Cir. 2011)
Amos VAUGHN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner ofSocial Security, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 10-1542.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: January 28, 2011.
Decided: February 15, 2011.Page 560
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. David W. Daniel, Magistrate Judge. (2:0-cv-00028-DAN).
Amos Vaughn, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Mary Ellen Russell, Social Security Administration, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Amos Vaughn appeals the magistrate judge's order granting the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment in this action challenging the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vaughn v.Astrue, No. 2:09-cv-00028-DAN (E.D.N.C. May 4, 2010). We deny the motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.