WILDER v. SEBELIUS, 349 Fed.Appx. 817 (4th Cir. 2009)
Lawrence Verline WILDER, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KathleenSEBELIUS, Secretary, United States Department of Health and HumanServices, Defendant-Appellee. Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr.,Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathleen Sebelius, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 09-1310, 09-1366.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: October 20, 2009.
Decided: November 3, 2009.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:97-cv-01809-FNS; 1:96-cv-03472-FNS).
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Tamera Lynn Fine, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying his motions to reopen two civil actions that have been closed for more than ten years. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v.Sebelius, Nos. 1:97-cv-01809-FNS; 1:96-cv-03472-FNS (D.Md. Mar. 4, 2009). Wilder's motions for rehearing and rehearing en banc, for appointment of counsel, and for an excusable neglect waiver are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.